SECRETARY OF DEFENSE Pete Hegseth is under increasing fire for a double-tap strike, first reported by The Intercept in early September, in which the U.S. military killed two survivors of the Trump administration’s initial boat strike in the Caribbean on September 2.

The Washington Post recently reported that Hegseth personally ordered the follow-up attack, giving a spoken order “to kill everybody.” Multiple military legal experts, lawmakers, and now confidential sources within the government who spoke with The Intercept say Hegseth’s actions could result in the entire chain of command being investigated for a war crime or outright murder.

“Those directly involved in the strike could be charged with murder under the UCMJ or federal law,” said Todd Huntley, a former Staff Judge Advocate who served as a legal adviser on Joint Special Operations task forces conducting drone strikes in Afghanistan and elsewhere, using shorthand for the Uniform Code of Military Justice. “This is about as clear of a case being patently illegal that subordinates would probably not be able to successfully use a following-orders defense.”

  • Maggoty@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    26 minutes ago

    That would require the administration’s own people to bring those charges.

    And I can already tell you the words you’re going to hear if this makes it to court. “Unlawful Combatant”, a designation we created so we could ignore the rules of war while fighting in Afghanistan and Iraq. Trump declared the Venezuelan drug cartels to be terrorists. Now they’re treating them like we treated the Taliban in Afghanistan.

    These guys are literally just waiting for the next outrageous thing to push this one out of the news cycle.

    And yeah, we’ve been doing airstrikes like this for 20 years.

  • apftwb@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    43 minutes ago

    Does being convicted of a war crime or murder make you ineligible to be Secretary of Defense?

  • Yeather@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    2 hours ago

    50/50 they pardon everyone or Trump uses this opportunity to forcefully retire more generals and get Hegseth out.

  • tomi000@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 hours ago

    “held liable” means some bad press in ‘radical left’ media at this point, right?

  • Endymion_Mallorn@kbin.melroy.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    66
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    10 hours ago

    Held liable by whom? The President who absolutely would say he agreed with it? The legislature that will talk a good game but fold before doing anything important? The courts who are owned by the parties? Or the police who want this to be SOP, and wouldn’t enforce any orders for arrest?

  • pleasejustdie@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    8 hours ago

    I worked at Fort Lewis in the RCF (Regional Correctional Facility, aka prison) and we had an Army soldier who got 3 years for 1st degree murder because he mercy killed a combatant after they got covered in white phosphorous. Literally everyone was like “how the fuck do you only get 3 years for first degree murder?” and then when they read his court documents were like “what the fuck, you got screwed and obviously everyone knew it…” They legally determined that at the moment they were no longer fighting back they became non-combatants and to kill a non-combatant instead of rendering aid is murder. Since the judge and jury agreed that it did violate the law, but hoped that if they were ever in that combatant’s shoes, they would want someone to do to them what this soldier did, so yeah, guilty, but sentenced to the bare minimum allowed.

    I know for 100% fact there is precedent already. But that is rules for thee, not for them, so I highly doubt we’ll see anything happen. I’m sure they’ll claim they need immunity because they were operating under special rules of engagement or some bullshit, and it will take years and lots of lawyers and in the end it’ll drag on until its forgotten about and gets quietly dismissed somewhere.

  • falseWhite@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    166
    arrow-down
    11
    ·
    13 hours ago

    100% nothing will happen, or they will just get pardoned. USA is done. Kaput. All hail Nazi USA.

    • WizardofFrobozz@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 hour ago

      It’s fucking comical how many Americans seem to think that the collapse of their entire legal system is just a blip and there’s a “normal” to go back to

        • teawrecks@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          60 minutes ago

          So to be clear, you’re suggesting the reason for allied forces joining WW2 was to save Germany from itself?

          I’m not disagreeing that Trump will pardon everyone involved, I’m not disagreeing that no other country cares if the US comes out the other end, I’m just saying, these regimes have a history of not sticking around long term. So I’m disagreeing with the statement that “nothing will happen”. Shit is happening and will continue to happen until their reign of terror is brought to an end, just like WW2.

          • NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            14 minutes ago

            The thing is that Germany was a land empire; to expand they had to piss off and/or invade their powerful neighbors. America can do whatever the heck it wants and as long as they don’t do something dumb like attack China they’ll be left mostly to their own devices. Hell, I’d bet good money that the EU won’t lift a finger if they annex Greenland. We’re looking at more of a Franco or Sukharto situation.

    • NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      44
      ·
      12 hours ago

      Even before the USA was kaput, double tapping became typical US strategy under the Obama administration, which makes me even more confident that nobody will face any consequences for this. To try Trump they’d have to try Obama.

        • alaphic@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          40
          ·
          10 hours ago

          I really don’t understand why people (GOPers mainly, it seems) trot this line out every time there’s the “threat” of a Repub being (gasp) held accountable for something…

          We don’t fucking CARE! GOOD! Prosecute the criminals! It doesn’t matter what side they’re on politically!

          Some of us don’t hang our hat on individual cults of personality and just want the rules applied equally all the way across. Why is this so difficult to understand?

          • jjjalljs@ttrpg.network
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 hour ago

            For some people, their entire world view revolves around “there must be in-groups to protect and out-groups to bind”. That’s it. Everything else is a polite fiction on top of that.

            These people are, generally, bad people. Like, a child reading about them in a book would point out that they’re not good.

            Many conservatives adhere to this world view.

          • NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            4 hours ago

            We don’t fucking CARE! GOOD! Prosecute the criminals! It doesn’t matter what side they’re on politically!

            You don’t care, but the people in power do. That’s the point I was making.

        • danc4498@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          14
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          12 hours ago

          And……. Nothing will happen. As both commentators said and are, depressingly, probably correct.

      • arrow74@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        8 hours ago

        I’ve seen this sentiment a lot lately. It’s just a very bad argument.

        We aren’t going to type out a list of every US war criminal ever. We are talking about current events and want the active war criminals stopped.

        Obviously we should try all war criminals, but let’s stop the war crimes first

        • NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          4 hours ago

          That’s not my point. If Democrats seriously attack Trump on this, he’ll hit back by attacking them for supporting Obama, and establishment Democrats won’t throw their man under the bus. Ergo, nothing will happen. Screw Obama, but that’s not the argument I’m making here.

          Edit: Aaand there it is.