

???
Porn is protected speech?


???
Porn is protected speech?


Good thing he’s term limited.
Also, are you pretending a Republican wouldn’t have commuted her sentence on 1/20/25?


Sure but I’m asking if, in the most famous gay street in the US, there are bars that are not “gay bars”


Laws are stupid because people break them
Yes! No laws! Everything should be legal!!!1


Are there non-gay bars on Castro st? Never been to SF but all I know is that’s like the most iconic/historic gay district


Now? You think they always weren’t?


No I mean, could I bet on “who cheated polymarket out of 400k”?


Damn, my money was on “someone Hegseth drunk texted secret plans to”
Edit: wait, could I have actually bet money on this on Polymarkt?


Note that none of these (that I saw) included anything about the number of casualties, fatalities, the fate of any specific individual, etc.
Not saying I agree, but I imagine that’s their “line in the sand”


Wait didn’t we do that a year ago when we had a single attack that somehow destroyed all of their nuclear capabilities?


If it’s a best place to work, why would anyone want to work from home? I bet the mother just didn’t know that part or else she would’ve gone to the office


No, I bet this brilliant work of investigative journalism dug it up /s


Yeah… there are a lot of issues here. Serial killer vs spree killing, the use of IQ (where the hell would they get that?), and so many other weird things that you highlighted
And yeah, to your last point… the USA is definitely an outlier on inequality but you can’t compare “margins” like that lol


That’s not how “rates” work though


Hello one of the oldest and most trusted Lemmy users, can I bribe you to use another platform with the world’s sketchiest link?


The one we just started?


I mean, how many rules are we expected to read?!
Oh, it’s the first rule?


Really? You see a lot of CSAM? That’s not my understanding of it at all, but I’ll defer to the expert


How does CSAM tell you anything about the abuser? It only reveals the victim.
There is not right to view porn. Maybe making it, yes. Although SCOTUS has notably never defined obscenity in terms of porn. And that is as drastic oversimplification of the Ashcroft case.