• rose56@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    2 hours ago

    It sucks. I know its not for everyone and for sure its gonna cost €€€€.
    The foldable phone are fine, yet expensive and not so widely used.

  • asudox@lemmy.asudox.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 hours ago

    And who asked for it? They very well know that nobody will buy that.

    Just get a tablet at this point.

  • Th4tGuyII@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    3 hours ago

    Considering everyone I know with a folding phone has had a fault with the folding part of it - I don’t think its the best idea from a durability standpoint to add yet another folding part.

    If one screen or fold point breaks, you’re now left with two unusable (but perfectly functioning) screens. Seems like an expensive gimmick to me.

    • filcuk@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      7 hours ago

      Because they’re fragile. You don’t want your screen to die on the first drop.

      • 14th_cylon@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        7 hours ago

        and you don’t want it full of scratches, since cover glasses and protection cases will probably be quite complicated for these monstrosities?

  • athairmor@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    92
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    11 hours ago

    This is going to be like shaving razors, isn’t it? How soon before quad-fold phones?

  • Beacon@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    9 hours ago

    This is a very cool piece of technology. The comments here naysaying about it seem odd to me. If it’s not for you that’s fine, but many millions of foldables have been bought over the past few years, and they continue to sell very well today

    • Aeri@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      39 minutes ago

      And they will continue to have big ass creases visible in the folding part

    • lime!@feddit.nu
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      6 hours ago

      it is a very cool technical achievement, but the user experience leaves a lot to be desired with them. most people don’t think about comparing. which is the only way i can imagine samsung getting as big as they have.

      • 3abas@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        6 hours ago

        Statement with no substance. What do you desire that’s not there?

        Aside from the screen being softer and easier to scratch, name a practical difference between this and another 10" Android tablet…

        If a 10" tablet meets your desires, and your desire to fold it and put it in your pocket, what’s left?

        • lime!@feddit.nu
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          5 hours ago

          well that is part of the user experience. the main thing that annoys me though is that the ui tends to go one of two ways for these devices; either it’s super-custom to the point that all application developers have to do extra work to be usable on it, or there’s too little customisation, which again means apps are not properly usable without extra work. i’ve not seen a folding device that “just works” yet.

  • KickMeElmo@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    50
    ·
    11 hours ago

    Whose brilliant idea was it to demo this with a wallpaper that looks like a shitty diagonal screen fold?

  • warm@kbin.earth
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    11 hours ago

    Impressive from an engineering standpoint and it’s only going to get more refined. Give it 5-10 years and maybe they will be durable enough for regular use.