A former Illinois deputy has been sentenced to 20 years for fatally shooting Sonya Massey, a Black woman who called 911 for help.

Sean Grayson, 31, was convicted in October of second-degree murder. Grayson, who is white, received the maximum possible sentence and has been in police custody since being charged in the killing.

Massey’s family members, who were sitting in the court, celebrated his sentence with a loud cheer: “Yes!” The judge admonished them.

Grayson apologized during the sentencing, saying he wished he could bring Massey back and spare her family the pain he caused.

“I made a lot of mistakes that night. There were points when I should’ve acted, and I didn’t. I froze,” he said. “I made terrible decisions that night. I’m sorry.”

  • sakuraba@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    13 hours ago

    I remember when this was on the news, I watched the video.

    I want to believe the cop is actually sorry but I can’t trust any cop at this point.

  • rumba@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    17 hours ago

    According to body camera footage, Grayson and sheriff’s Deputy Dawson Farley, who was not charged, searched Massey’s yard before meeting her at her door. Massey appeared confused and repeatedly said, “Please, God.” The deputies entered her house, Grayson noticed the pot on the stove and ordered Farley to move it. Instead, Massey went to the stove, retrieved the pot and teased Grayson for moving away from “the hot, steaming water.” From this moment, the exchange quickly escalated. Massey said: “I rebuke you in the name of Jesus.” Grayson drew his sidearm and yelled at her to drop the pan. She set the pot down and ducked behind a counter. But she appeared to pick it up again. That’s when Grayson opened fire on the 36-year-old single mother, shooting her in the face. He testified that he feared Massey would scald him. Grayson was charged with three counts of first-degree murder, which could have led to a life sentence, but a jury convicted him of the lesser charge. Illinois allows for a second-degree murder conviction if evidence shows the defendant honestly thought he was in danger, even if that fear was unreasonable.

    That’s a pretty fucked up situation. Would have been nice if they would have just left.

    There has to be more to it than the article quotes,

    • lightnsfw@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      16 hours ago

      I saw the video of it. He has no excuse to responding to her the way he did. She was not threatening in any way. 100% calm until he yelled at her and pointed his gun at her so she hid behind the counter. This prick deserves everything he has coming to him in prison.

    • thermal_shock@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      18 hours ago

      Its not even this, it’s so much simpler. Mistakes happen, but so many of their “mistakes” are 100% avoidable and no one is ever accountable for their shitty actions. Thats the main reason I hate cops. They’re arrogant assholes that just like to abuse citizens, and even when faced with irrefutable evidence of wrongdoing, “they did nothing wrong” by their dept.

      Fast food workers are held under higher moral standards than the fucking cops. ACAB.

      • Cosmonauticus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        12 hours ago

        18 year olds in Iraq were held at a higher standard than police in the US. This could’ve been avoided if white America recognized police brutality in black neighborhoods

    • SCmSTR@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      19 hours ago

      These people are all liars, manipulators, rapists, abusers, and murderers. Part of the point of the trial is to find out if it was on purpose or not. And time and time again, magas always express sadness ONLY when punished, and then after, double down on it.

        • SCmSTR@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          18 hours ago

          Devil’s advocate: If you saw the things that Hitler did and made others do, and then could be the one to kill him, I think there would be a significant portion of us who would get over human and living being empathy pretty quickly and then take quite a lot of deep, actual joy from ending him.

          I realize what you’re saying, but it just made me wonder if maybe they aren’t so wrong after all. For the record, I’ve never killed another person, and have never seen another person die in real life, and all real people I’ve seen killed in video have been truly awful. Yet, I feel like I could take the life of somebody I decidedly thought were irredeemingly bad if needed, and not feel very much remorse. And yet, I don’t want to have to ever find out… But still, there’s that age old question: kill or be killed? And I may hesitate. My genetic family has made it this far, I’d like to believe it wasn’t full of blissful murderers, but we all know that that’s what we all were; it’s how we think about, and systemically settle our differences now and into the future that matters. Is reconditioning or even prison truly hubris? I can’t believe so. Humans are intelligent and capable of not only change but evolution, we now know that as fact. That I, alone believe in change, yet myself come from a long line of survivors in the age old question of kill or be killed, is evidence of the contrary. Even if the hubris is learned, proves that we are capable of change and hope for better.

          Some murderers are gidddy after killing - I would argue that it doesn’t mean much. Even assuming they’re truly happy, it doesn’t define them as absolutely lost. Or maybe evolution states we purify the gene pool. What other things should we purify? Do you see the problem with that sort of fear? Maybe we should all be giddy with happiness to cleanse ourselves of perceived insanity. Or maybe the desire to do so is exactly how that murderer became that way to begin with.

      • Earthman_Jim@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        19 hours ago

        Are cops automatically MAGA in the US? I’m in Canada so I think it’s probably a bit different; the cops here are a mixed bag and some seem to genuinely care about the community. In the states are they really all MAGA? That’s horrifying.

        • SCmSTR@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          18 hours ago

          I only live in one state, and don’t travel a lot. So I only really know my tiny pocket. But in my tiny pocket, it used to be a somewhat mixed bag, but that job really does attract the worst types and the best types, and the best types can be easily swayed by fear and groupthink. I tend to stay away from cops as much as I can, just because of personality differences, and they’re mostly all power-trippy types, it’s just the nature of the job, and the longer things go, the more that’s affirmed. And control is just had by changing whatever they perceive is the right thing to do.

          I’m sure there are humble, normal people out there, but their low visibility through need to conform basically defines the trade alone; most cops really are, or will become, bastards.

          Now, whether or not they’re really MAGA or not… You realize, the KKK was/is a community organization, right? Caring about the community is not the issue here, this is a long running cold war of philosophy and world view. And right now, the fascists are overwhelmingly in power, which makes both the loud and the quiet types very much emotionally empowered, and in essence, even louder.

          Honestly, if we could just isolate them and put them in a pocket dimension time out for a few generations, they’d mostly kill themselves and each other. I’d be curious how they’d all evolve. Or maybe that’s where we all are right now. #sadface

          • Earthman_Jim@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            18 hours ago

            Good point about the KKK. When I say “community” I mean every member of society, but obviously that’s not a universal agreement, and also probably not true in the purest sense anyway.

            I appreciate the thoughtful reply.

          • sakuraba@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            13 hours ago

            Grayson was charged with three counts of first-degree murder, which could have led to a life sentence, but a jury convicted him of the lesser charge. Illinois allows for a second-degree murder conviction if evidence shows the defendant honestly thought he was in danger, even if that fear was unreasonable.

            It could have been a life sentence but he played the “I felt in danger” card

  • Suavevillain@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    1 day ago

    RIP Sonya Massey. 20 years isn’t really enough. But when it comes to police the bar is so low for them to get held accountable it is better than nothing.

    • ameancow@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      21 hours ago

      I’m actually surprised, I read this story a while back and expected it like so many US injustices, particularly right now, and that the cop would get a paid vacation. I was deeply depressed.

      I mean I still am, but I was back then too.

      Either way, I hope he experiences in prison what cops who go to prison experience. 20 years isn’t enough to make someone feel the pain they’ve inflicted on others by taking a life for no reason, and he will likely get out early if he lives, but at least I know however long he’s in there will be either in sheer, constant terror, or utter isolation as he’s kept separate from the general population.

  • the_crotch@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    1 day ago

    It’s really weird that they capitalize “black” in these stories. I get that it’s relevant to mention because these things happen to black people a lot more often, but that doesn’t make it a proper noun. They didn’t capitalize “white”. It seems like pandering and it’s kind of gross and racist in its own way.

    • tackleberry@thelemmy.club
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      12
      ·
      23 hours ago

      I tend to avoid stories like that because its obvious the author is trying to push in a racial divide amongst its readers.

      • the_crotch@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        21 hours ago

        I feel its relevant to mention the race of the victim because racism in law enforcement seems like a potential cause in a lot of these incidents. Statistically black people are much more likely to be the victim, we can’t fix that unless we acknowledge it. Mentioning the race of the cop, not so much. It’s more of systemic issue. Black cops seem to carry a lot of the same biases.

        • tackleberry@thelemmy.club
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 hours ago

          If you can read the story and still get the message without adding the race of those involved, then race is not a necessary addition.

      • MiddleAgesModem@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        18 hours ago

        See I don’t have a problem race being discussed if it has a direct role in the situation. The capitalization is weird though.

    • Nailbar@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      14
      ·
      1 day ago

      Someone said in a separate post, where the same question was brought up, that it’s because Black refers to a specific cultural group while white doesn’t (that’d be Irish-American or whatever)

      You don’t have to always assume it’s malice.

      • Hathaway@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        20
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 day ago

        Ah yes, the historic culture of “black” stretching from New Zealand to Africa and South Asia and South America. You know, all very monocultured.

        The largest /s imaginable

      • the_crotch@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        18
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 day ago

        Black people aren’t a monolith either though. They come from all over the world, just like white people. That explanation is offensive in a totally different way.

        • tackleberry@thelemmy.club
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          23 hours ago

          Honestly I prefer people are identified by their tribes or families. It is more specific than using vague colours. I have never seen a white human being yet we have been programmed to all ourselves white. You mean white like salt? That’s what I mean when I say white. Use tribes or families to identify people. Much better than vague colours

        • ThrowawayPermanente@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          20 hours ago

          Actually all monorities are a monolith, which is why you can refer to them using using the singular noun (‘The Jew’) and everybody will know you’re talking about all of them. Hitler wrote a entire book about this.

      • MiddleAgesModem@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        18 hours ago

        So that means everyone with a certain skin tone MUST be in the same specific cultural group?

        It’s not malice but it is mistaken. “White” is used as a general term as well.

  • LoafedBurrito@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    20 years isn’t enough for his lack of empathy for a woman who did nothing wrong and was simply trying to get help and make dinner.

    He had a license to kill and used it and didn’t think he would be held accountable.

  • 58008@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    85
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    Cops have a stressful, often life-threatening job, no doubt. But so do a lot of people. My family has a history of working in psychiatric lock-ups with extremely violent mentally ill and developmentally abnormal patients, most of whom are being held because of murders and rapes they’ve committed (usually of their own families), and who would murder you if they had the chance/inclination to do so, because they simply don’t know any better. The nurses don’t carry firearms, they’re trained with a few restraining grappling technique and a lot of deescalation tactics. They don’t even have tasers. Put an armed cop in that situation and you’d have a ward full of corpses within a few days. Hell, put a regular prison guard in that situation and you’d have a similar outcome. But my family members aren’t MMA experts, and have never been [seriously] injured in their job. They’ve been properly trained, that’s all. Cops are trained like they’re being shipped off to 'Nam in 1969 to fight an unseen, non-uniformed enemy.

    • lofuw@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      13 hours ago

      What happens when restraining/de-escalation tactics don’t work and the unarmed civil servant gets raped and/or murdered?

      A lot of people never see the inside of a psychiatric ward because their behavior is too dangerous for them to be brought in safely. If it was up to a nurse to apprehend them, some people will just take advantage of the opportunity.

    • iegod@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      1 day ago

      “Often life threatening” is not likely to be true. Sometimes, yes. Often? No chance.

    • Kaz@lemmy.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      28
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      Dutch cops often walk around without guns.

      Definitely a boys club and training issue in America.

      • markovs_gun@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        The Netherlands doesn’t have more guns than people though. The US does.

        Edit- this is not excusing cops shooting people, I am just saying that gunless cops makes more sense in a country where everyone isn’t armed to the teeth

            • BanMe@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              6
              ·
              1 day ago

              Ironically every corporation bars you from doing that because they would be liable. There are probably some small mom-and-pop places that advise drivers to carry. And of course plenty do despite the rules against it.

        • FatVegan@leminal.space
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 day ago

          Switzerland has almost as many guns as people. But they are treated as a tool, no one really wants, not like a dick extension

        • AlexLost@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 day ago

          And why is everyone so obsessed with guns in this same US of A? I wonder if one begets the other. People have been fearing the police in America for a looooooooonnnnnnng time. Also, see the post you replied to. Just because you’re in the shit, doesn’t mean you need all the guns and ammo on the planet to do your job. If it’s a serious violence threat, then send in the swat. Patrol should be using guns as an absolute last resort, not a first inclination. The mentality is skewed, but no surprise there given the rest of things going on down there.

        • Triasha@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          That makes it more dangerous for the us cops but doesn’t excuse shooting people without guns.

  • Zombiepirate@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    222
    ·
    2 days ago

    Cops will go fucking nuts on someone merely because they don’t comply; their pea-brains simply cannot tolerate anyone who dares to question their authority.

    Dude shouldn’t have even gone into the house, he refused to leave and deescalate, then murdered a woman instead of just walking out of the door of a place he didn’t even belong.

    • galacticbackhoe@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      16 hours ago

      They go nuts on people who do comply. They give conflicting instructions and then punish you when you don’t comply. ICE will ask for your ID and then walk away with it and never give it back.

      They are all human garbage fires and I can’t wait for Nuremberg 2.0.

    • Manjushri@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      106
      ·
      2 days ago

      The problem is fear. In general, we don’t teach cops how to deal with complex situations. We don’t teach them how to deescalate potentially dangerous situations. We don’t teach them how to peacefully resolve conflicts. All they are taught now is Killology (AKA Warrior Training).

      Grossman’s America is a terrifying place where police are both the primary targets of and defenders against superpredation. “Increasingly the police must face organized opponents armed with assault rifles and bombs,” Grossman says at the outset of the class, citing an “explosion in violent crime” and an “extraordinary rise in violence” in the streets of America.

      Grossman maintains that America is now scarier than ever—and that cops may well be the ones with the most to fear. “We know that if it were not for all the body armor, bulletproof vests worn by officers, law enforcement fatalities in the United States would easily be double or even triple what they are today,” Grossman asserts. “If this is not war, then you tell me what is.”

      Cops out there now are terrified that they are constantly in the sights of one bad guy or another. They are in a state of constant terror that anyone might pull out a gun and murder them. People in that mindset cannot be trusted to be “peace” officers.

      • Janx@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        18 hours ago

        There’s some of that, but I think it’s pride more than fear. Cops hate it when you don’t “respect their authority” or dare to assert your rights. They think they have the right to do whatever they want, no matter what the law says…

      • Gork@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        41
        ·
        2 days ago

        Grossman maintains that America is now scarier than ever—and that cops may well be the ones with the most to fear. “We know that if it were not for all the body armor, bulletproof vests worn by officers, law enforcement fatalities in the United States would easily be double or even triple what they are today,” Grossman asserts. “If this is not war, then you tell me what is.”

        This man has a financial interest in keeping officers as scared as possible so their Chief can book training courses with this guy.

        I wouldn’t take whatever he says as having any basis in reality.

          • sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            21
            ·
            1 day ago

            One of the fucking greatest things I’ve ever seen.

            Dude apparently thinks he has been shot, so of course, what makes sense to do is:

            ‘Combat roll’

            (Utterly tactically useless given the angle from where he thought he was being shot from)

            ‘Suppressive fire toward a restrained person in custody in a police cruiser…’

            (“I need to shoot my partner’s car!”)

            ‘… narrowly missing his partner cop…’

            ‘… and with flimsy ass shit tier residential townhomes as the back stop beyond the car.’

            That guy needs to be sentenced to only be allowed to appear in public in a full on clown suit for 5 years.

            Its actually a miracle he didn’t kill anyone.

    • BrianTheeBiscuiteer@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      32
      ·
      2 days ago

      It didn’t seem like at any point the woman was in a state of mind to calmly invite them in. It’s like they always make the choice that maximizes their chance of shooting someone.

      I saw footage of a different encounter where a bunch of police were hanging out right at her backdoor even though she was clearly distressed and didn’t even think about giving her space. Pretty sure they also shot her through a screen door while she was still in her house.

      • BillyClark@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        2 days ago

        The woman reported a prowler and they had already checked the outside of the house. I wonder if they actually needed to go inside the house in the first place.

        I wouldn’t voluntarily allow cops into my house unless the situation required them to enter my house.

        • TexasDrunk@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          2 days ago

          Agreed. I wouldn’t let one of them shitbags in my house if they were offering me a sack full of cash and a harem of consenting porn stars unless it was absolutely required by law. If I get burgled I’m just going down to give my statement so I can get a case for my insurance company because I know they ain’t gonna investigate it and by allowing them in the house my odds of dying increase greatly.

    • M137@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 day ago

      It’s not even about anyone daring to question the authority, it’s anyone who they decide in that very moment is a threat (based on no logic at all). There are so many videos of American cops demanding people to do things they clearly can’t do or just are impossible to do, like two different things that are exclusive to each other. And tons of other videos of people doing exactly what they’re told but no the cop(s) already decided that they’re a threat no matter what.

    • Nalivai@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      1 day ago

      Well, I wouldn’t say it’s happy to be honest, a life has lost anyway. Not the worst one though, for sure

      • JustTheWind@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        20 hours ago

        True. I guess I’m just jaded enough that I hope for anything other than “zero consequences for the officer; plus he’s still working as LEA somewhere” That shit’s actually terrifying