• Malfeasant@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        23 hours ago

        They are, actually. The point of patents and copyright is not to protect the creator- that’s a temporary effect. The point is to release the thing to the public afterwards. The problem is that capitalism corrupts the process and finds ways to make the temporary effects permanent. Disney has succeeded in making copyright last effectively forever.

      • Doomsider@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        1 day ago

        Copyrights and patents generate enormous amounts of wealth from rent seeking. This wealth has been used to continue to entrench these draconian concepts into our legal and governmental systems.

        Even worse they have been used to stop the spread of information and monopolize development thus slowing down technological advancement. So many people have died so these clowns can make a buck.

        One could argue that artificial scarcity is a farce, but unless you have more money than the people who benefit from IP, your voice will not be heard on a policy level.

        • Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 day ago

          Correct. Patents and copyrights are state granted monopolies that are in direct opposition to free market forces that capitalism thrives on.

          • cornishon@lemmygrad.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 day ago

            Free market? As in, competition between different enterprises? And what do you think happens when one company “wins” that competition? It will use that power to establish a monopoly (or a cartel with a couple buddy companies). Both “free market” and “private monopoly” are capitalist fenomena, just at different stages of development of industry.

          • SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            1 day ago

            Sure, everyone should work for free except you, of course.

            Patents only last 15 years. why isn’t the government making insulin.

    • quoll@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      23 hours ago

      yeah. but more importantly your fucked up excuse for democracy is fucked.

      plenty of capitalist countries that don’t have this problem.

  • AlexLost@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    23 hours ago

    In Canada it is still considered expensive, but not even close to $800/month. It’s only considered expensive because most shit like that is free or a very nominal fee, but repeated need is what it is.

  • AsoFiafia@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    46
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    The drug I have to take to live costs anywhere from $4,000-$5,500/month without insurance. This is actually cheaper than what I was on before—a cocktail of 4 drugs, some taken multiple times a day, that was almost $10,000/month. I’m lucky(?) that there are a ton of programs that together cover the cost for me. Unfortunately there are hoops I have to jump through every month to continue qualifying for the assistance and have to regularly take time off from work to make the appointments. I’ve lost jobs due to this, but am currently working a position where my manager is happy enough with my work to fudge time cards to help me out.

    I hate this country.

    • SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 day ago

      oh, it gets better. Baby born with Spinal and Muscle Atrophy? There is a cure! $2,500,000!

      They hold lotteries for doses, a few babies win, most babies die.

  • Devial@discuss.online
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    27
    ·
    1 day ago

    If he wanted it to be freely available, why did he even sell the patent ? Just disclaim at the patent office. Selling is just asking the new holder to start enforcing.

    • squaresinger@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      37
      ·
      1 day ago

      They sold the patent to the University of Toronto, so they didn’t exactly sell it to a for-profit patent troll.

      But also, that was in 1923, so the patent has long since expired.

      • buddascrayon@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        37
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        They also don’t make insulin the way that he did back then. Not justifying the price hike cause the way its made now is way cheaper than it was with the old method (which was basically grinding up animal parts to extract insulin). These fucks are just profiting off of the suffering of Americans who have literally no choice but to use their drug.

        https://youtu.be/naqbi_qVoVY

      • Devial@discuss.online
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        I mean, that’s better than selling to a private person, still feels weird, since disclaiming a patent is absolutely possible, and has a 100% chance of leading to the desired outcome, vs whatever small chance there may be that the University starts taking profits on it. Or even just sees themselves forced to sell the patent, because of potential financial issues.

        Yeah, the risk is small, but eliminating it in it’s entirety would’ve been easily possible, so it just feels a bit weird he didn’t do it.

        • cøre@leminal.space
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          5 hours ago

          I never heard of disclaiming a patent until just now. Maybe he didn’t know about or it didn’t exiat in the 1920’s

  • Digit@lemmy.wtf
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    35
    ·
    1 day ago

    Welcome to USA, I guess.

    In other countries, you could probably completely fill a fridge with insulin for $800.

    • Korhaka@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      1 day ago

      If you need a lot of different prescribed drugs then £114.50/year to cover every prescription you have is an option here. Otherwise £9.90 each.

  • ZkhqrD5o@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    46
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    I genuinely think that in some third world countries, as part of the middle class, you can have a better life than in the USA.

    • MoonMelon@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      26
      ·
      1 day ago

      Something I’ve noticed is when untraveled people in the USA try to contextualize themselves with other countries they pick the worst examples they can think of. Favelas in Brazil or slums in South Africa for example. We do this to the point where our entire conception of countries (or in the case of Africa, continents) is the worst imagery we can think of. I think they genuinely don’t believe that, for all their troubles India, Brazil, Mexico, Nigeria, etc also have smartphones and big buildings and libraries and universities and laboratories, and educated people living decent lives.

      They also can’t see how the overcrowded jails full of pretrial prisoners, the barefoot children carrying buckets for water in Appalachia, the rundown schools full of illiterate kids, the impunity of rich private interests, the corrupt sheriffs and judges, and on and on, puts us in the company of the “third world countries”. Yes we have nice places too, but SO DO THEY. A broken society in the 21st century isn’t people living in mud huts, it’s children shitting in the street next to a glass skyscraper with LEED Platinum certification.

      • SinAdjetivos@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        12 hours ago

        And it’s not just “overcrowded jails full of pretrial prisoners, the barefoot children carrying buckets for water in Appalachia” but the grad students in LA living out of their cars, or grandpa sleeping on a bus stop, or people in the Rockies surviving off roadkill and forage.

        Seattle tent cities/tiny homes make some Favelas look real swanky.

    • Zerush@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      22
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      Logically, it’s not about how much money you make, it’s about purchasing power. It is irrelevant if you earn only $400 a month when you can eat well for $1 and pay $100 for your housing, you have free health care and education. That is the reality in some third world countries.

        • Fredthefishlord@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          1 day ago

          Espousing an old no longer relevant definition to sound smarter and be “right” is peak lemmy/reddit behavior. Third world does mean poor now.

              • Reginald_T_Biter@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                22 hours ago

                Strictly, technically every other way China is still third world. This concept of third world being poor seems to have originated from the common charity ads in the 90s and 2000s who loved the phrase, and from the American exceptionalism that thinks everything not American is dirty and poor.

                • Fredthefishlord@lemmy.blahaj.zone
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  19 hours ago

                  Being poor is the only way a country is third world or not. Being politically related to America is not relevant to the present definition. So no, it is not “technically in every other way”. It just is not a third world country, period.

        • ManOMorphos@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 day ago

          No one really uses that word in its Cold War context anymore. It’s the common term for “developing countries” and the like.

            • ManOMorphos@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              20 hours ago

              You’re right that they either never learned what 1st-2nd-3rd world really means, or they forgot what they were taught in history class. Unfortunately it still is the main term to refer to poor countries even though it’s incorrect. Language seems to be biased towards the common meaning over the technically correct meaning.

        • Zerush@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 day ago

          Spain isn’t third world, it already had shown the middle finger to Trump and also has few to do with Rusia. Third world countries don’t certainly mean people starving, the people there often have all what they need, but this, you’ll see few Ferraries there and chalets with swimming pool. Someone is rich, not necesarly because a lot of money, but because he need only few. We often enter in a rabbit hole of the consumism, spending a lot of money in things we really don’t need, we work like a dog to have enough money to pay a journey to Hawaii to recover us from the burnout, which we wouldn’t have working less, no needing this journey.

          • LH0ezVT@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            4 hours ago

            Have you been to Spain? I’m not saying it is not better than where the US is headed to, but it’s a “western” country in Europe, with all the issues that come with it. Somewhat social market economy, but still suffering from the usual issues, including people driving Ferraris while others sleep on the street.

            Also, at least since Franco I don’t think anyone genuinely thinks of Spain as third world.

            • Zerush@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              14 minutes ago

              Well, I’m from Spain, also in Spain there are People with Ferraries (few) and also poor people, but there is nobody without food, because Spain has a strong social system and free healthcare for everyone. Nothing, absolute nothing to do with the US, it’s the opposite in almost everything. Luckily Spain has also little dependency on the US or Rusia, so it is also not much affected by Trumps Tariffs or Rusian Gaspolicy. Trump hates Spain.

        • chonglibloodsport@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          6
          ·
          1 day ago

          If you can eat well for $1 then it is definitely a poor country relative to the US. Differences in purchasing power are a direct result of differences in wealth.

          • Zerush@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            1 day ago

            I think that the US is a third world country, it’s rich but most money is used for weapons and to make richer the billonairs and big corporations, in the social and cultural sphere, it is one of the most backward in the world. Now with Trump the US is turning in a running gag for the most countries. A country where 40 milloncof citizen don’t have enough to eat at least 2 times a day, isn’t a rich country.

              • Zerush@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                21 hours ago

                USA is an total dystopic country, any Banana Republic has more culture. US is only powerfull because use all the money for weapons, developed by foreigner scientifics. First world is anything else.

                You will say that the US is a first world country, it’s better for your health

    • ebolapie@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      There’s a reason countries like Vietnam are so popular with digital nomads.

      • WALLACE@feddit.ukBanned
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        My dream would be to get a remote nightshift job and live in a house by the beaches of south Thailand

      • NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 day ago

        Not really. Poverty rates are higher, yes, but many middle income third world countries do have sizeable and growing middle classes. They’re called developing countries for a reason. The image of war-torn African countries where everyone works in mines isn’t really representative.

    • volvoxvsmarla@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      36
      ·
      2 days ago

      Making an AI meme of Luigi as a Saint is one thing.

      Making a painting and having it casually displayed in your room is a whole other level.

      Also, I can’t believe it’s already been a year.

      • Formfiller@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        45
        ·
        2 days ago

        Yea I guess but my mom was destroyed by our cruel and heartless system. She’s gone now but painting this helped me reconnect with the glimmer of hope we all felt for a moment after this happened. It also helped process the trauma I myself went through as her caregiver not being able to access what she needed

        • AnarchistArtificer@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          1 day ago

          Symbols are powerful things. I’m not an American, but something that surprised me with Mangione was how people on the left and the right seemed to support him. It was a rare case of example of political unity amongst regular people.

        • volvoxvsmarla@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          2 days ago

          I am so, so sorry about your loss. I’m glad to hear that you were able to feel a beacon of hope last year, and that this painting was a way for you to cling on to it and feel it a little longer. I hope you find a way to keep holding on to it, and through that hope find the courage to not give up and try to support change instead whenever you can and have the strength and energy to do so. But I can’t even imagine how hard that must be. And most of all, carry the love you had for your mom in your heart despite the grief, and the disgust and hate for the system that led to her demise quicker than it had to be.

          I hope you don’t mind if I save that picture of yours.

    • Tollana1234567@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      2 days ago

      the OOC might be TYPE 1 which is even more dependant on insulin than type 2, because you’re pancreas cant make any insulin at all. plus there also other expenses that comes with being type 1. CGM, INSULIN pumps(which are often regularly replaced because they wear out). you can sometimes tell when someones type 1, if they have a device attached to thier arm, its usually a circular button, thats the sensor(its another cost)

      • buttnugget@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 day ago

        I’m sure they’re Type 1. At least with Type 2 you can kind of manage it a little without the meds. The insurance company should be firebombed for refusing to replace the damaged meds.