US President Donald Trump signed the 2026 National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) into law Thursday, completing the passage of the largest military spending bill in US history—$901 billion, or over $1 trillion when combined with supplemental funding passed earlier this year.

The Senate voted 77-20 on Wednesday to pass the bill. The Democratic leadership, including Minority Leader Chuck Schumer of New York and Minority Whip Dick Durbin of Illinois, voted for the bill. They were joined by Senators Mark Kelly of Arizona and Elissa Slotkin of Michigan, both of whom released a video last month calling on military personnel to disobey illegal orders—as Trump was sending the US military on a murder spree off the coast of Latin America.

Citing Trump’s statements about using troops to shoot protesters in America, Slotkin invoked the legacy of the Nuremberg tribunals, which convicted Nazi leaders for war crimes and crimes against peace. But when it came time to vote, this invocation was revealed to be completely meaningless. Slotkin voted to hand Trump the resources to pursue his military adventure against Venezuela…

  • MyMindIsLikeAnOcean@piefed.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    4 hours ago

    Obscenely corrupt. These people shouldn’t be helping Trump on a single bill…even if he placates them with what amounts to a jobs program. Not a single vote until ICE is gone and he starts following the law…just for starters.

  • melsaskca@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    43
    ·
    14 hours ago

    The world under capitalism is so twisted that war is good for the economy. Let’s start using ecology as a measuring stick. That money thing is old and worn out and it shows us humans to be fools.

  • ☂️-@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    9 hours ago

    see, this is why we say voting won’t solve your problems. don’t hate the messenger.

    you could use rethinking instead of blaming russians or tankies or whatever.

  • rose56@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    7 hours ago

    Where at my USA citizens, who will run for their life’s if a war starts, if, if. Instead of de-throning Trump.

    Just sit and watch…

  • EtAl@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    13 hours ago

    They can’t give that to Trump. How is Elon Musk going to become the world’s first multi-trillionaire?

    • CatAssTrophyA
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      14 hours ago

      If you pick the right currency, Musk is already the first multi-trillionaire!

    • D_C@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      13 hours ago

      More war = less people = more food for the survivors. It’s simple maths {taps head }

      • finitebanjo@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        35
        ·
        21 hours ago

        So you think the DNC should have just let defence budget lapse until a better deal magically manifested?

        • BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          7 hours ago

          Why not? Apparently that’s how MAGA thinks things should be handled. They should be happy to see Dems adopting the same strategy.

          • finitebanjo@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            4 hours ago

            Why not? Because the world is at the precipice of WWIII due to the USA’s diplomacy going limp and heavy aggression from Russian and Chinese expansionism. Whatever tens of millions suffer because of Republican letting social safety nets falter, which is not mutually exclusive mind you, is nothing compared to the amount of suffering caused if hostilities broke into US backed nations and states across the pacific.

            It’s one thing to say “we should spend less on military” or “the military should be able to pass audits”, but to say “defund the US military” is some clear Tankie propaganda shit of the highest order.

            • BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              3 hours ago

              I’m not advocating for dismamtling the military, but I do think we should hamstring the MAGA traitors as much as possible. Only a small minority of Americans truly support these PedoCon Traitors, and we shouldn’t allow them to turn the entire world against us. Limiting their use of the military via budget and legislation and courts is the responsible thing to do for the future of our country.

              Once America is back in the responsible hands of sane adults, we can talk about re-establishing a reasonable military budget.

              • finitebanjo@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                2 hours ago

                These pedocon traitors are the majority in congress. They write the offers and we either have a military budget or we don’t. There is no middle ground we can claim.

        • phutatorius@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          24
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          14 hours ago

          Yes, that would be the correct thing to do. The DOD isn’t going to go without money while legislators haggle over spending for the next fiscal year.

          • finitebanjo@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            5 hours ago

            That is exactly what would happen. That’s how budgetary spending works. If congress doesn’t pass it, they don’t get the money.

        • Stern@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          27
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          19 hours ago

          So you think we shouldn’t try to rein in Trump starting another forever war?

          • finitebanjo@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            31
            ·
            19 hours ago

            The bill mentioned by the Chinese propaganda outlet above is the passing of the annual military budget. It increased by a very large amount this year because Republicans and fascists are running the show.

            It has NOTHING to do with Trump starting another forever war, any more than not signing it has to do with welcoming a Chinese invasion across the pacific. It explicitly only has to do with how much the USA is spending on its military specifically for 2026.

            • phutatorius@lemmy.zip
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              16
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              14 hours ago

              It increased by a very large amount this year because Republicans and fascists are running the show.

              OK…

              It has NOTHING to do with Trump starting another forever war

              Which would greatly benefit from increased defense spending. So it looks like, in fact, it has a lot to do with it.

            • uncouple9831@lemmy.zip
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              15 hours ago

              Straight to the point, I think the main thing was giving soldiers a raise.

              Even a government shutdown doesn’t prevent trump from starting another war. He can do literally anything he wants, clearly including war crimes, with the military he already has.

              • finitebanjo@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                5 hours ago

                War crimes and also just plain old third degree murder. He used to joke about walking down park ave and shooting somebody in the face, well I guess he proved it correct when he blew up boats full on unarmed civilians.

  • killea@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    127
    arrow-down
    19
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    The sooner every American realizes that there is NO ONE in the government with the desire and the power to help us, the better.

    Edit: VOTE and be educated, but don’t expect anyone therein to be accountable and reponsible. Get ANGRY about that.

    • Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      7 hours ago

      I think we should redesign the system so candidates are nominated, and anyone who has ever expressed a desire to hold office is instantly disqualified.

      Basically make it more like jury duty, except make it pay very well.

    • DarkSideOfTheMoon@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      68
      arrow-down
      19
      ·
      1 day ago

      This is a dangerous narrative. Many people are not voting because this narrative the two sides are the same. They can do a lot in common but they are definitely not same. This year alone proves it.

      • freagle@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 hours ago

        The dangerous narrative is that Democrats are different. The number of people killed under the Democrats is staggering. Stop propagating this narrative that somehow voting for Democrats is better.

      • agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        17 hours ago

        I think the main point is “the desire and the power”. There are a few with desire, but without numbers they don’t have the power. The more people with desire we can get into seats, the more power they’ll have, collectively, to do something.

      • 3abas@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        18 hours ago

        Right, not the same. One tells you they hate you, the other tells you they love you but fuck you over anyway and let the first get all the blame.

      • xenomor@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        41
        arrow-down
        12
        ·
        edit-2
        2 hours ago

        I simple don’t understand why anyone buys the sentiment that you are an expressing here. The unfortunate truth is that, in every substantive way, it is true that the two parties are in lock step. I am aware that Democrats will sometimes use rhetoric that implies that they have more enlightened positions on some issues. However, it’s not credible when they consistently cave, pre-compromise, and shift rightward at nearly every opportunity. I’ve been observing the party, from within and without for 40 years. I’ve come to the conclusion that as an organization, the party as currently organized, has NOT A SINGLE principled stand on any policies whatsoever. Let me be explicit: there is no issue on which Democrats organizationally are not willing to compromise or flip on including: abortion, civil rights, democracy, and so on. They are a loose conglomerate of self-interested corporate sell outs, period. Are there a few individual exceptions, of course. But as a collective, the party is trash, and they are the reason that fascism has been allowed to progress in this country for decades.

        What is needed is a wholesale reconstruction of that party. Replace nearly everyone in power and completely reject corporate funding. BTW, accomplishing that involves two things: 1.) voting, and 2.) rejecting the voices that demand that we lower our standards for short term political expediency.

        • agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          17 hours ago

          They still do good things sometimes, they generally do fewer and less bad things. Definitely need to be entirely reformed, but practically that’s a future us problem.

          Priority one is dismantling the other party. Blue collar Americans love socialism when you don’t call it that. Start a “right wing” party that’s just leftism wrapped up in Jesus and 'Murica. Split the right, let the neo-libs stabilize things for a couple cycles while the 'Murica party siphons the working class from Republicans. Then, after the Republican party is dead, hard shift on the left from Democrat to 'Murica, massive mandate, start passing sweeping socialist reform.

        • killea@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          23
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          1 day ago

          Yea it seems like a lot people don’t want to face the fact that US politics are a theatre drama. And of course they also presume that you’re implying that means one shouldn’t vote, indeed a dangeous (and irritating) assumption. I believe one should vote based on a politicians actions and character, and try to notice when they’re bought and performing. The preponderance of evidence that anyone with any power is bought out is defeaning.

          • chunes@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            15 hours ago

            A 2014 Princeton study found that the US is not a democracy, and I remember thinking back then that it was already fairly obvious.

        • finitebanjo@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          21 hours ago

          Bills like this come through when Republicans have power. It’s been more often than not lately because the DNC have had 48 or less Senators for over a decade.

      • killea@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        1 day ago

        Yes I understand and would not discourage voting. Its currently the only way to have any influence at all. Whole system needs to be turned over for anything to meaningfully change; vote as much as possible and get thoroughly educated, just don’t expect politicians to do anything helpful when they’re already owned by money.

      • nondescripthandle@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        1 day ago

        If the political parties are scared a narrative is going to reduce turn out they should probably stop enforcing that narrative with their decision making. Neither party can vote against their constituents then claim they’re the good guys.

        • Whostosay@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          1 day ago

          The whole point is that we know they are shitbags and money hungry whores, but they are undeniably better for your everyday life and wellbeing than Republicans, full stop.

          • nondescripthandle@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            9
            ·
            edit-2
            1 day ago

            Lesser of two evils turned into lesser of two genocides and soon it will be lesser of two fascists and that logic is exactly why were slow walking into it. Other countries look at the US like we’re insane for this type of shit. It doesn’t have to be this way, but if you keep voting for evil you’ll keep getting evil.

            Oh and the democrats you insist are better just helped the republicans pass a bill that legally invalidates intersex people, and the republicans could not have passed it at all without the dems help. There’s literally no issue they won’t compromise on if it’s politically expedient. Nothing.

            • Whostosay@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              5
              ·
              1 day ago

              There’s a time and a place for everything refraining from voting on election day is not a good time or place. You want to help get other parties in motion? Now’s the time. Abstaining your vote doesn’t do shit but help the least popular policies come to fruition every single time.

              • nondescripthandle@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                8
                ·
                1 day ago

                I didn’t abstain from voting so you’re welcome. I like how you have no argument against helping slow walk fascism to the US other than being patronizing and assuming I didn’t vote. The least you could do is not parrot decades of American lesser evil propaganda that has been the dominant voting culture while the US has been regressing, maybe take a critical long term look at that.

                • Whostosay@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  4
                  ·
                  11 hours ago

                  Did you forget the thread you’re arguing on? This is about voting and not voting.

                  Get involved in other ways than this if you want real change, you being right isn’t going to accomplish that.

        • finitebanjo@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          21 hours ago

          “Reinforcing the narrative” in this case is not letting the annual military budget lapse.

    • Jax@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      Mm, I’d be willing to bet that there are some who really are America first. It just so happens that includes waging war and extracting resources from places too weak or otherwise unable to defend themselves.

      The choice U.S. citizens are being given is clear. We can extract resources from you or we can extract resources from someone else. Resources will be extracted either way.

      • CmdrShepard49@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        We can extract resources from you or we can extract resources from someone else. Resources will be extracted either way.

        They’re doing both.

        • Jax@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 day ago

          Correct, the difference is which will happen first. Given the option, the American people will choose the latter. They just need to be coerced into it first.

  • Hotznplotzn@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    51
    arrow-down
    21
    ·
    1 day ago

    The world socialist website parrots Chinese Communist Party propaganda only, they even support China’s aggression against Taiwan and Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, among other things. This is not a reliable media source.

      • Hotznplotzn@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        9 hours ago

        This is a propaganda site as they intentionally seek information supporting propaganda and information supporting propaganda only. They have a strong article selection bias, and they support China’s aggression against Taiwan and Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, among other things. We must clearly say that this is not a reliable source.

    • Socialism_Everyday@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      17 hours ago

      You then certainly agree that essentially all western media, given its support of Israel’s genocide, is not reliable and shouldn’t be listened to? Or those standards are only to be applied to the evil leftists?

      • phutatorius@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        14 hours ago

        Calling the CCP leftists is amusing. They’re totalitarian state capitalists, Han nationalists and imperialists.

        • Socialism_Everyday@reddthat.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          arrow-down
          9
          ·
          14 hours ago

          China doesn’t have colonies and hasn’t waged a war in 40 years, hilarious that you’d call them imperialistic likely coming from a western nation.

          Han nationalists is also very funny, I’m from Spain, a country where the police recently literally went and violently repressed a vote for independence from Catalonian people in a clear violation of the right to self determination. But sure, multiethnic China is totally Han nationalists. How many non-Han Chinese living in China have translated this opinion to you?

          Keep yapping western anti-China propaganda, useful CIA tool.

      • uncouple9831@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        15 hours ago

        How about we meet in the middle: lets not listen to the nytimes about the middle east or trans people and not listen to Chinese government media about the US?

    • guismo@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      arrow-down
      18
      ·
      1 day ago

      Funny opinion from someone who is obsessed with only posting stuff against China.

      I don’t know if the source is worthy reading, but this user sure is not.

        • guismo@aussie.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          11
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          17 hours ago

          Is he getting paid for that?

          It’s funny people down voting but even the “propaganda” website they mention have a lot of non China content, but this guy is 100% foaming against China as if nothing else exists in the world. If that’s not propaganda I don’t know what is.

          I’m not a fan of China, but there’s much worse evil in the world right now like the US and Israel before his brainwashing can work.

          • GrammarPolice@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            8
            ·
            16 hours ago

            but there’s much worse evil in the world right now like the US and Israel before his brainwashing can work.

            That does not excuse left-wing propaganda though? Especially not of the imperialist kind

          • Hotznplotzn@lemmy.sdf.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            10 hours ago

            Don’t remember that I used this source, must be long time ago.

            But even so, that’s everything you complain? Is there nothing more?

            Would also be curious to learn what sources you deem reliable.

            • guismo@aussie.zone
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              9 hours ago

              It’s not the reliability of the sources. It’s the obsession. Even the website you complain about have non Chinese content. But you are 100% constant anti China posts.

              China does a lot of bad stuff. Every country does. But why do you obsess with them so much?

              I would really like to know. Because with no explanation it either looks like you’re being paid by an enemy of China like the US or that something bad happened to you and you need to seek help because you got some deep trauma.

              I don’t think Lemmy is big enough for the US to pay someone to do propaganda. So it looks really odd.

              • Hotznplotzn@lemmy.sdf.org
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                5
                ·
                8 hours ago

                What an absurdly weird comment. I just tried to engage in some discussion, but this doesn’t appear to lead anywhere.

                • davel@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  5 hours ago

                  I don’t comment on your accusation.

                  You never do. You just keep on keeping on.

                • goferking (he/him)@lemmy.sdf.org
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  ·
                  7 hours ago

                  And the post here is factually reporting dems voting to increase the military budget.

                  Yet you’re critical of the reporting site here but okay when it’s one your posting.

                  Do you see the hypocrisy???

                  I don’t comment on your accusation.

                  Which is what happens every time it’s brought up so 🤷

        • guismo@aussie.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          13 hours ago

          Have you ever checked your post history? Did you ever even post anything that’s not about China? And was any of those posts against?

          China sucks, but if you are being honest you have some really twisted mind to not realise your obsession.

      • goferking (he/him)@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        12
        ·
        1 day ago

        That’s how you know they know what is propaganda /s

        But yeah it’s hilarious having them complain about sources. They’d be fine with it if it had something bad to say about China

        • phutatorius@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          14 hours ago

          Two things can both be bad. And even more shockingly, one bad thing can be worse than another.

          • davel@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            5 hours ago

            Liberals keep saying “two things can both be bad,” as if it were some brilliant gotcha when it’s nothing but a thought-terminating cliché. Please stop embarrassing yourselves. Either make an actual argument or don’t comment.