Correct! Edit: Actually, the other post didn’t misrepresent them! I switched the number from a different post, one that states 40% of young men believe women lie about reports of domestic violence. So, not misrepresented by them — simply a mistake by me. You can add this datapoint to the list of datapoints I’ve already provided.

Now, do you have separate reasonings for the popularity of men like Trump, Nick Fuentes, Charlie Kirk, Andrew Tate, Joe Rogan, or any of the other disgusting ‘thought leaders’ that influence many young men today? What about red pillers? Black pillers? What are your explanations for those things?

I don’t have the patience to hunt down every data point because I don’t need this to confirm what I already know — something is very wrong with an unsettlingly large number of men. Oh there are plenty of reasons why there are things wrong with them, many of them quite tragic — does that change reality? No, now go cool off.

Ah, I see — so let me get this straight.

You try to call in to question the report I’m mentioning which, congratulations you found the one I’m referencing. Then claim it’s inaccurate*, then claim I must only believe in Fox News and am probably conservative?

And you’re telling me that you’re able to judge others ability to critically think? Captain Assumption is lecturing me?

Reddit misses your engagement, also scrutiny doesn’t have two i’s.

Have you seen the report suggesting that 40% of genz men believe women should be subservient to their man in all ways?

I’m not sure I agree with your assessment.

Edit: I made a mistake, it’s that 40% of young men believe women lie about domestic violence and rape. So that’s much better, obviously.

Removed by mod

Removed by mod

Removed by mod

Removed by mod

the children of leaders calling for war

Right right right, I believe you — totally.

The more you say stupid shit like this the closer we come to a draft where Barron is sent to whereever the safest place near-ish the front lines is.

You are sleepwalking into a draft and you should be ashamed for even suggesting it. Like, genuinely — you are a stupid, bad fucking person for hoping for a draft.

Edit: Interesting how many troglodytes came out of the woodwork, and half of them are Canadian. When children, your children, start to die as a result of the world you’ve helped build — I will not let you forget.

Listen, you can be surrounded by people and totally alone. I don’t really know how to explain it to you.

I’m pretty sure that waffle could easily fit 5 rows of 5, am I crazy?

It’s still funny

Yes, but wouldn’t it become that much easier to achieve with an effectively limitless quantity of the resource?

I mean yeah, Musk is a fucking idiot that wants to retroactively prove the book he got his name from.

At least, that’s my headcanon.

Oh, I don’t blame the lonely person for being lonely. I also recognize that being lonely is what opens them up to believing in something like this. Obviously the bot should not be allowed to tell someone to kill themselves. It remains sad, either way.

It is sad that there are people who are so alone that they can no longer determine the difference between genuine human interaction and a facsimile. Maybe genuine human interaction is what pushed them to be so alone in the first place, I don’t know. It’s just sad.

While I don’t like Musk, it’s actually never made sense to even attempt to go to Mars without taking advantage of the helium-3 stores on the Moon.

I think you’re quite possibly the most reasonable .mler I’ve come across — I’ll have to look into more about what you’ve said, but I appreciate the read.

You guys are arguing between Stalin and Hitler — conversations like these are not productive.

Whatever my sources are more or less stated exactly what you’re saying — outlawing something in 2021 only to have to release further legislation in 2025 doesn’t exactly seem like a ‘solved’ problem to me. It is good that the trend is negative. Public control is one thing, however the ‘socialist’ country still produces billionaires which I simply struggle to understand as being socialist. Apparently wealth disparity simply doesn’t matter when talking about this topic (which I feel is pretty important when talking about China, we’re talking the top 10% in China owning two thirds of the wealth compared to the U.S. which is just 4 or 5 % higher than China’s).

Yes, I understand that the people apparently own the means of production — I still struggle to understand how that can be true with such high (and continuing to climb) wealth inequality. It just doesn’t add up, unless we’re willing to accept that China isn’t actually socialist but capitalist with socialist flavor.

FIRE china style!

Right