• 2 Posts
  • 368 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: August 25th, 2025

help-circle

  • Purely from a manufacturer perspective, I would go Lenovo. Ive had more problems with Dell hardware than with Lenovo hardware.

    In terms of what can run, both are capable. I’d lean towards more ram in general, and the 4 laptops I have are lenovo workhorses, the newest of which is ~5yrs old, the oldest ~10yrs old, all happily chugging along just fine.

    So I’d vote Lenovo.




  • Bigscreen only just came back around, I wouldn’t go too heavy there yet (and I’m testing it out already myself)

    Get flex launcher instead. Simple config, does the job.

    In terms of specs, there is a lot in your list that can vary, and make those specs jump. Where to start, IMO, would be a 7th gen Intel. If an 11th gen is an option, there and up transcoded av1.

    For storage you’re going to have to do the math yourself in terms of what you’ll have. I have 40tb of media. I used to have a 1tb drive for everything. Storage is how much you want to allocate, nothing more or less.

    Ram is similar. Find the worst case game, most overloaded with plugins Minecraft server or whatever, and start there on memory use. JF won’t take much, your game choice might.



  • curbstickle@anarchist.nexustoLinux@lemmy.ml•It's a lot
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    27 days ago

    Shitty hard right rich douche put together dotfiles for arch, called it a distro, and was given lots of money from 1password.

    DHH being a hard right rich douche is not news, but 1password giving $300k to aforementioned hard right asswipe is recent news.

    Thats a reasonable summary IMO.






  • My workstations are Debian, my laptops are a mix of Debian and Arch, same with test hardware.

    They all look the same - KDE as my desktop environment, no generic software added at install, just adding what I want. If you were to use any one of them purely from the GUI (KDE), I doubt you’d know which was which without checking version info.

    Linux is a kernel. A desktop environment is the GUI. The distro is packaging.

    The difference between distributions is predominantly what is packaged up, the tool used to install/update, and an overarching philosophy on those tools.

    Debian is about being stable. This means more dated packages, but running into issues from an update is (mostly) not even a question when running the stable branch. Amazing for workstations and older hardware IMO.

    Arch updates constantly. Updates can introduce breaking changes, even minor ones, which can interrupt workflow. It also means the latest and greatest features are right there and ready quickly. I like arch for testing and making use of recent hardware that may not have support elsewhere yet.

    You could also build entirely from source, use a downstream from Debian like Mint (Debian Edition) or Kubuntu, or downstream of Arch like SteamOS or EndeavourOS. Downstream distributions add more opinion under a more particular approach to their upstream counterparts. For some its to make the system easier to install (EndeavourOS vs Arch), add more recent features (Kubuntu vs Debian), or to make something incredibly specialized (SteamOS, formerly based on Debian and now based in Arch, highly focused on gaming).

    The only thing thats “pure” Linux is the kernel. Everything else comes down to purpose and preference.







  • He associated with Defend the Atlanta Forest, which due to being against Cop City, has been flagged as a terrorist organization by the fascists in charge.

    There is literally no other reason to be found.

    His lawyers have already found (through internal CBP emails) that they flagged him for suspected terrorism because he was associated with Defend the Atlanta Forest.

    They internally categorized the group as anti-government, anti-authority, and a violent extremist group.

    He protested against Cop City and associated with a non-violent, peaceful org that also protested against Cop City. Thats it.