• eicker@lemmy.worldOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    77
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 days ago

    We spent decades teaching people not to click suspicious links, then handed our inboxes and payment permissions to a chatbot that treats »ignore previous instructions« as a promotion to management. The phishing email no longer needs to fool you: It just needs to fool your very expensive autocomplete intern.

  • rebelsimile@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    36
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    2 days ago

    Yeah no shit, 20 years of gmails ‘s complete inability to determine spam from real email is testament to this

    • Godort@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      2 days ago

      It turns out that making a machine that is capable of determining the difference between actual legitimate messages and messages pretending to be legitimate is a really difficult problem to solve

    • 🌞 Alexander Daychilde 🌞@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      2 days ago

      That’s a very interesting take. Gmail has always had one of the better spam filters in my experience. I absolutely remember when common wisdom was that if you were inundated with spam, one way to help was to forward email to a gmail box and have its spam filters run on it.

      Even today, I see very few false positives and false negatives.

      YMMV of course.

  • Jo Miran@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    2 days ago

    Why use AI to read emails? My rules are that if in Inbox and unread for a week, move to Purgatory. If in Purgatory for more than a month, delete.

    If you want me to read an email, you better text me that you emailed me. Receipts, updates, and all that jazz already have filters and rules.

    • Freeposity@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      8 hours ago

      Why use AI to read emails?

      If you’ve had the same email address for the last thirty years, like me, you get a LOT of email. An email assistant is great.

      Also, with proper prompting and a proper setup, email is not a vector for phishing emails because you’re not allowing your agent to click on links and enter in credentials(except for entering in the credentials for your email).

      Also if you do any sort of AI email sending, you should have three different LLMs look it over before sending out and they must all be in agreement.

      • Jo Miran@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 day ago

        If you call me, something very important better be on fire. (Assuming we’re still talking work)

    • Leon@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      2 days ago

      I need to step up the names for my filters I see. Any and all meetings immediately go to Kokytos. Weredog pamphlets? Elysion.

  • LeftReddit2@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    Why would you use your AI Agents to check emails? I only use my locally run AI Agents to send me incredibly insulting messages on Matrix and Signal because I’m into that kinda thing.

    • atrielienz@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 day ago

      Unless you go in and specifically turn them off they are on by default in some email systems like Google’s (and I think Microsoft’s).