- 331 Posts
- 40 Comments
119·4 days agoWhy? What harms come from the AI generated stories to their readers?
Interesting.
Got any sources for this claim?
Will that change the news? The title would still be the same and the original source would still be the same.
Filtered or unfiltered. It’s still news.
Take some responsibility for what exactly?
Your disagreement with him is not going to change the event.
The title would be the same even if from other source. “US senator” is not an honorary title, it’s a job.
Thank you.
I fixed it.
Who the fuck prints stuff on paper in 2026/2027.
Check this article.
Fuck Euronews. They are a terrible news source for Europe news.
I am downvoting this shit.
Actually, no.
Not at all:
The AI infrastructure buildout is entering a new phase: Tech companies are doubling down on AI.
Graph Source: Bloomberg.
US tech companies are committing to spend a record $850 billion on data center leases over the next several years.
This marks a +$570 billion YoY increase, or +204%, and +$200 billion QoQ increase, or +31%.
Meta, $META, added the most in Q1 2026, committing +$79 billion in new leases, a +76% QoQ increase, bringing its total to ~$183 billion.
At the same time, Microsoft, $MSFT, added +$41 billion, a +26% QoQ increase, bringing its total to ~$197 billion.
Oracle leads with the largest total commitments at ~$250 billion, having already secured many of the key sites needed to fulfill its contract with OpenAI.
Source: The Kobeissi Letter.
I just want to say… what the fuckkkkkk.
Shit has gotten hot so quickly in the AI space in the last 6 months.
No, I am Beep.
Sigh
The UBS Report, that the whole article appears to be based on.
I don’t know why the Guardian had choosen to get this sloppy with this article.
For the OP who posted this article here, this article doesn’t seem even related to technology.
I don’t know what to say.
The article that he posted have bad title and is written by bad news outlet(Futurism),IMO.
Sigh
If you had read the situation, you would find that the information news outlet reported this first, then the media talked about it then Meta admit this in news statements. (They didn’t even release a blog/press release).
While I don’t rule out that it’s a publicity stunt, I think it’s very unlikely. Otherwise I would call Meta terrible at marketing because they are not loud about it at all.
In my opinion, OpenAI accident has triggered a wave of scans among AI companies to discover any problems before they get hold liable for damages by the hacked company and to solve them internally.
That’s how I read the situation as of 7th of August. My opinion might change, if any new info came out that seem sus.