Donald Trump has suggested US taxpayers could reimburse energy companies for repairing Venezuelan infrastructure for extracting and shipping oil.

Trump acknowledged that “a lot of money” would need to be spent to increase oil production in Venezuela after US forces ousted its leader, Nicolás Maduro, but suggested his government could pay oil companies to do the work.

“A tremendous amount of money will have to be spent and the oil companies will spend it, and then they’ll get reimbursed by us or through revenue,” the president said.

The US energy secretary, Chris Wright, reportedly plans to meet representatives of Chevron, ConocoPhillips and ExxonMobil at the Goldman Sachs Energy, Clean Tech & Utilities Conference in Miami later this week.

  • CanadaPlus@futurology.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    6 days ago

    So he invaded Venezuala for oil money, but is planning to take a loss so that other people can sell that oil for him.

    A genius businessman, everybody.

  • fodor@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    6 days ago

    Lol Donny you’re losing the thread here you gotta pretend to fuck over foreigners, not Americans. Come on now, focus!

    • elucubra@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      6 days ago

      I believe this saying would be more accurate stated as follows:

      Nationalize debt, privatize profit.

  • wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    6 days ago

    FUCK THAT!

    If taxpayers pay for it, then taxpayers should receive the profits.

    Why the fuck should taxpayers finance capitalist ventures that only enrich the shareholders?

        • a_non_monotonic_function@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          6 days ago

          At my age I think that is the only course in system that allows unrestricted hoarding of resources.

          I don’t think these people have anything outside of their need to hoard in life. It is a mental illness.

          • wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            6 days ago

            I agree with you completely and I’ve been calling it out for years. People treated me like I was a crackpot for saying things like “infinite pursuit of growth is neither possible nor desirable.” Or “life isn’t a zero-sum game and a system that’s built to uplift everyone is better than a system designed to maximize gains for a few.”

            Clearly there aren’t many leftists around me, or at least the ones who are hate me for different reasons. Maybe because I said MLs are authoritarians and no better than maga. I like democracy, it’s capitalism that needs to go. The Nordic model seemed to work just fine until right-wing propagandists invaded Scandinavia.

            Oh, I also compared capitalists to cancerous growths, and that made the oligarchs feel so oppressed. Maybe that’s why billionaires these days are comparing themselves to holocaust victims. Those poor billionaires… won’t anyone think of the shareholders?

            • Tollana1234567@lemmy.today
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              6 days ago

              they are also obsessed with longevity, they want to outlive the people they exploited so they dont come after them, plus to remain relevant.

            • a_non_monotonic_function@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              5 days ago

              Clearly there aren’t many leftists around me

              Sounds likely. I don’t know many that aren’t terrified of a society that glorifies unreasonable accumulation.

              • wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                5 days ago

                Because they think it would allow them to do the same…

                …while they work into their seventies because a full retirement is out of reach for most of the working class…

      • Tollana1234567@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        6 days ago

        his wealth has grown like 3x since he was elected, before that he was losing quite a bit of money fending of lawsuits and other cases in court.

    • INHALE_VEGETABLES@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      6 days ago

      I’m no expert and would love to be told if this is wrong, from what I’ve heard, oil companies won’t be doing jack shit so I don’t think you will need to worry about your tax dollars reimbursing them.

      Oil is barely profitable for investment at the moment.

      If it was they could invest into US oil in the permian basin where there is still billions of barrels to go. Drill baby drill, I belive they say.

      Investment would be much more stable in the US because fuck knows what is going to happen in venuzula in the next year, let alone in the next administration. They would probably lose it all over again.

      • wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 days ago

        It would be profitable for them if they get the taxpayers to cover all their expenses while keeping the gains for themselves.

        It would be evil, but capitalism doesn’t care about that. They only care about what’s profitable, even if everyone else suffers as a result.

        • INHALE_VEGETABLES@aussie.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          6 days ago

          Oh, well yeah if the tax payers are tax paying then yes they are pretty fucked but I still don’t see them actually building anything.

          He couldn’t even build a wall last time, she’ll be right mate.

  • qyron@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    6 days ago

    Wait! Isn’t socialism, according to the american doctrine, a very bad thing?

  • RunawayFixer@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    6 days ago

    That article reads like they’re trying to sell the bear’s skin before they’ve caught it. They kidnapped the Venezuelan leader, but the rest of the old regime is still in power. The USA doesn’t control anything on the ground, yet they’re talking as if it’s a done deal and that they can just walk in and take over.

    I also wouldn’t want to be a us oil company employee that gets send over to Venezuela. Even if the USA somehow manages to take control of the oil fields, there’s likely to be a lot of sabotage and guerilla attacks.

    • shalafi@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      6 days ago

      Yep. The US can’t exert real control without boots on the ground. Boots who would, once again, find themselves fighting angry, and well armed, citizens.

  • stringere@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    6 days ago

    Goldman Sachs Energy, Clean Tech & Utilities Conference in Miami later this week.

    Earnest wuestion: How does one find out about events like this with sufficient notice to organize protests to disrupt and shut these kinds of meetings down?

  • Peruvian_Skies@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 days ago

    Everybody who voted for this imbecile should be forced to reimburse the rest of the world for the damage he and his cronies are doing. Everything they own plus twelve years of indentured servitude would be a very small first step.

    • nforminvasion@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      7 days ago

      At least. Honesty, when they’re starving in the coming depression and when their kids are bleeding out on a battlefield, they’ll suffer enough. They might not be cognizant of it and they’ll do the whole mental gymnastics but those conditions affect your subconscious and physical health beyond what you can ignore

    • presoak@lazysoci.al
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      10
      ·
      6 days ago

      You really think things would be different if the other sock puppet got elected?

      • frog_brawler@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        6 days ago

        Are you questioning what the impact of electing someone as president does, or were you simply aiming for the dumbest comment of 2026?

      • UltraGiGaGigantic@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        6 days ago

        Things would be different, but not what we deserve. We deserve multiple political parties to choose from that represent us all. Not a duo poly holding us hostage.

      • demonsword@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        6 days ago

        The other candidate would probably try to at least keep the appearances that we live in a civilized world, and that international law and treaties work. The Big Orange Turd doesn’t care for such niceties.

        • presoak@lazysoci.al
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          6 days ago

          There’s the quiet sneaky puppet and the loud aggressive puppet. They switch them appropriately. They’re basically there to give us something to yell at.

      • 0_o7@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        6 days ago

        They’re not thinking at all. They are just using talking points from their “party” on deflecting any responsibility for the fascist actions of their country and turning the blame on someone else to feel self righteous.

        Hypocrisy is something yankistanis are born with. Pathetic spineless rags.

        Have no doubt, they’ll throw anyone under the bus. They’re only bothered this war criminal is from the wrong party, other wise they’d be kissing ass.