Elon Musk said he would hire Jensen Huang if Nvidia’s board removes its longtime CEO.
“That would be an honor,” Musk wrote on X Wednesday evening, responding to a post from financial news account ZeroHedge that said: “Elon please hire Jensen.”
The exchange came soon after The Wall Street Journal reported that Nvidia’s board was preparing to oust Huang following revelations about two extramarital relationships.
I don’t think Jensen is qualified for a job in Elon’s boy’s club. He only had sex with adult women.
Why are you so sure?
He’s incredibly wealthy, runs a company supposedly important to everything, and was honey potted by a spy…
One of the main things honey pota do, is rack up blackmail. The goal is not just to get caught with the affair.
Depending on how long this was happening, she would have kept accumulating blackmail, including trying to get him to rape kids.
It’s wild for people to assume if they didn’t hear about shit it never happened in 2026.
Guess the chances that the following who were technically in the Epstein files raped kids, it can be a little time capsule:
You are in the epstein files. Somebody needs to check your computer
Aw why didnt you play the game? We all know the Republicans are far more likely to be recreational child rapists meow
That’s just speculation without any evidence. I wasn’t assuming anything but I’ll stick to the available facts.
On Lemmy, this is somehow controversial ^
Wouldn’t even surprise me if someone insulted you or claimed you’re covering for pedophiles for simply being reasonable.
Buddy…
Assuming every billionaire who hasn’t been caught raping kids has never raped a kid is just a wild position in 2026…
I’m not saying assume they all have, I’m saying none of them should be getting explicit benefits of doubt like you are.
You stated it as fact, but as my dear friend Gin Rummy once said:
The absence of evidence is not the evidence of absence.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jHhG9DbHbW0
Making allegations in the absence of evidence shows that you have zero credibility, though, buddy.
I didn’t make allegations…
You said he only had sex with adult women…
I said you don’t know that, then you started trying to say I was saying he definitely raped kids.
How are you still confused here?
Only one person has definitively said they know if he’s having sex with just adult women or not, and that was you:
You made that claim, and all I’ve done is point out there is no way for you (or me) to know if that was true.
I even explicitly said this already:
Like, I legitimately don’t understand how you’re still not understanding this. Why are you trying to say I’m the one acting like either of us know?
Are you even reading these comments?
I’m going to chalk this up to you have a bad day that you’re putting this much energy into chasing down pedantry to this level and needing to score a win over socially understood semantics. You’re usually better than this.
I hope your day gets better.
I appreciate seeing you handle this better than I did/normally do. I think this is an exemplary reaction to a situation like this.
I’ve found myself in their same situation before. You get so far down a rabbit hole of “being right” that the win in itself is meaningless to anyone. For me the need for the win had nothing to do with the conversation I was in, but instead a distraction from other difficult things going on in my life.
None of us are perfect. I’d like to think I’ll never be in the same situation again myself, but I’m not vain enough to think I’m immune. I hope if it happens to me again others will remember my other better behavior and grant me the same grace.
Pretty obvious the intended meaning was
“As far as we know, he only had sex with adult women.”
It’s perfectly reasonable to stick to known facts. That shouldn’t invoke anger or be controversial. They never even said they didn’t think he was capable of that crime. I think everyone on this platform except the like 50 conservatives would agree it would be unsurprising if a CEO was a pedophile.
deleted by creator