Lesson for teenagers included how cattle’s methane emissions contribute to climate crisis, but it was then scrapped
A beef industry-funded effort to teach teenagers about cattle’s climate impact was quietly scrapped following backlash from some ranchers, who disputed the premise that cows contribute to global heating.
The episode is the latest example of the livestock industry’s decades-long battle to determine what US children learn about cows and the climate.
The American Farm Bureau Foundation for Agriculture (AFBFA) and its Food and Agriculture Center for Science Education produce a free science curriculum used by around 1.2m students across more than 100 school districts nationwide.
So much for Bovine University
Holy fuck when you look like an asshole compared to the fucking factory farming companies, you are truly a magnificent asshole.
Genuinely, farmers here in the states are such regressive fuckwits, it beggars belief. I know there are exceptions to the rule, but seriously, I honestly do hope that all of these willfully ignorant imbeciles get absolutely economically crushed, because they deserve it.
They are such a small demographic, and then they get surprised when the rest of Americans don’t want to rally around them politically.
Corrupt industry modifies industry propaganda to be even more self-serving.
It’s disgusting that any educational institution would use this marketing bullshit as a component of their curriculum.
A beef industry-funded effort to teach teenagers about cattle’s climate impact was quietly scrapped following backlash from some ranchers, who disputed the premise that cows contribute to global heating.
Oh so their day job is cattle ranching but they moonlight as climate scientists?
No one gets to dispute provable scientific facts, unless they have supporting evidence. And “I dispute this because it’s bad for my business” is not evidence.
We have a constitution, and it’s first amendment is nice and strong at protecting our right to disagree with scientists or even just spread disinformation to further our goals.
I hope it was sarcasm considering how thick it is, but you were struck by Poe’s gang
quash ≠ squash
SMASH!
Question: are we 100% certain that the Methane attributed to cows isn’t partially just leaked Methane from the natural gas industry?
Yes.
WTF why even ask that
Using figures from the UN’s Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, it showed that methane is a far more powerful greenhouse gas than carbon dioxide, though it has a short atmospheric life. The lesson also contained an error, stating livestock accounts for about 2% of human-caused methane emissions, when the true figure is a little over 30%, said Drew Shindell, a climate scientist at Duke University.
Yes I know the numbers. But how are we getting those when the only method we had to track atmospheric methane was shut down by the orange moron?
Edit: When that satellite was up, massive unreported industry leaks were found almost immediately. Industrial farming of cows is an issue, but the oil and gas industry deserves more blame than it gets.
You can estimate from being able to measure on individual cows across breeds and extrapolating
It’s not based on breed but on diet.
The reason I ask is that the oil industry is lies. We rely largely on their own self reporting for tracking Methane leaks after Trump took the satellite offline.It was brand new, and he ordered NASA to deorbit it. That’s a bit more drastic than taking it offline.
Come with some numbers proving your view instead of spreading uncertainty and doubt. You should have numbers with provenance akin to those being used by the academic who pointed out the error, not like the number in the beef industry’s "educational"material that was off by an order of magnitude.
