• Doomsider@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    8 minutes ago

    By backfiring you mean they have nearly total control then yes. Those losers, it has totally backfired on them and now they are richer and more powerful than ever!

  • pjwestin@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    2 hours ago

    Expect bipartisan legislation to increase the anonymity of PAC money before the year is over.

    • reksas@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      37 minutes ago

      should also campaign for third option so there are options and idiot party could be left to wither. Current situation leads to slow and inevitable fall as stagnation is the very best that can happen.

      Anything that makes republicans weaker is a win for your country.

  • BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 hours ago

    All Dems have to do is run with Data Center Prohibition as their main issue, and they would win EVERY election, and destroy the MAGA movement. Even Republicans hate Data Centers, and ALL MAGA candidates LOVE them. No MAGA candidate cans say anything against them. Florida MAGA candidates are trying to ease it by claiming that they’ll make sure that citizens won’t pay the costs, but everybody knows they’re lying. That’s about the most opposition they’re putting.

    MAGA is the party of UNLIMITED Data Centers. Just slam that over and over, and NOBODY will vote MAGA.

  • TrackenDaKracken@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 hours ago

    I can only hope this is true. Most voters aren’t paying a bit of attention to where the money comes from.

    They’re using AI. They think it’s wonderful, they’ve barely heard about the controversy around data centers, and think “data centers are where the internet it, yOU lIkE thE inTErNeT, Don’T yoU?”

    The Top 10 AI Uses in 2025 (none of which it does very well):

    • Therapy and companionship
    • Organizing my life
    • Finding purpose
    • Enhanced learning
    • Summarizing content
    • Generating ideas
    • Generating code (for professionals)
    • Improving code (for professionals)
    • Creativity
    • Visual art and design
    • pemptago@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      3 hours ago

      You’d be surprised. Data centers seem like a big issue. My boomer parents hate data centers, as do a lot of rural voters who have them nearby or proposals nearby. But to your point, I also see a lot of people who are aware of problems around ai/data centers/billionaires still using ai.

      • redballooon@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 hour ago

        The problems with data centers are not the data centers, it’s missing regulation about where and how to build data centers.

        It’s a very American problem.

    • taiyang@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      3 hours ago

      My thoughts exactly. I know two folks who are going all in with AI and haven’t even considered any controversy. Feels like they live on another planet. Hell, one of the guys was even showing off his pervert glasses and when I called them pervert glasses he laughed and said he hadn’t heard that before.

      I really hope those folks are in the minority.

      • pemptago@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        3 hours ago

        Dang. Their online filter bubble must be strong. Likely the kind of person who also doesn’t care about surveillance capitalism because “it’ll recommend good things to buy.”

        • taiyang@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 hours ago

          Quite right! When they email me for advice it’s often AI generated, too. I always come across as the insane person telling them not to trust AI (why even ask me for advice if you’re just going to vibe coded your site anyway…)

  • melsaskca@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    5 hours ago

    I’m sick of all the shiny shoes and the posturing. I need a serious person with substance.

  • elucubra@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 hours ago

    AI Billionaires Are Flooding Money Into Politics are flooding politics with money, or pouring money into politics.

    This is grade school stuff, FFS!

    • Asfalttikyntaja@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      7 hours ago

      I’m not trusting the US voting system anymore. I think it’s going to be rigged and they won’t get over the republicans. I still hope that midterms will change the way USA behave, but I’m not going to hold my breath for it.

  • inari@piefed.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    7 hours ago

    The next step seems obvious: they’ll take a page from the tobacco, gun, and meat industries and instead create fake think tanks or associations to funnel political money semi-anonymously.

    • eicker@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      50
      ·
      10 hours ago

      That’s the unsettling part. When billionaires spend fortunes shaping elections, it’s reasonable to ask whether they see voters as citizens to persuade or obstacles to manage. Democracy becomes a lot less inconvenient when you can fund the candidates, influence the platforms hosting the debate, and lobby the people writing the rules. All perfectly legal, of course.

      • Fushuan [he/him]@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        51
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        10 hours ago

        Y’all should stop using the word lobby and call it what it is. Bribery. The only reason your country isn’t stupid corrupt at face value is because you legalized bribery.

        • Humanius@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          31
          ·
          edit-2
          10 hours ago

          Annoyingly it also turned the word “lobby” into a contaminated dirty word, even though lobbying is a healthy and important part of a functional democracy.

          Any group collectively arguing in favour of their interest to the government is a lobby. That group can be anything from employers, to unions, to civil rights advocates.

          The problematic part is the bribery, not the fact that there is interest groups lobbying the government.

  • eicker@lemmy.worldOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    55
    ·
    11 hours ago

    Turns out telling people your technology will replace their jobs, devour their electricity, and possibly end civilization isn’t the winning sales pitch billionaires imagined. Imagine spending hundreds of millions buying political influence, only to discover voters don’t enjoy being treated like obsolete hardware.

    • Karjalan@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      9 hours ago

      telling people your technology will replace their jobs, devour their electricity, and possibly end civilization isn’t the winning sales pitch billionaires imagined.

      “but what you guys aren’t getting is the fact that it’ll make me a lot more money.”

    • Random_Character_A@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      9 hours ago

      AI is still not viable business. All that fear mongering is to create an alternative revenue sources.

      “look, I created a monster that can destroy us all. Please give me money to contain and tame it. We can’t destroy it because our enemies are creating their own monsters.”

  • Akasazh@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    7 hours ago

    Turns out that taking hubris to far, thinking that the public will suck it all up just because they always did does have its turning point.

  • nonentity@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    9 hours ago

    Financial obesity is neurotoxic, an existential threat to any society that tolerates it, and needs to cease being celebrated, rewarded, and positioned as an aspirational goal.

    Corporations are the only ‘persons’ which should be subjected to capital punishment, but trillionaires should be forced to transition into billionaires, and billionaires should be euthanised through taxation.