The meme is referring to tech bros who equate text prompts to creating visual art. The person who put art on a rock is a digital artist showing that actual digital artists can still create art even without their digital tools.
For example, someone who does 3d modeling but never sculpted could could make something decent out of clay on the first try because they understand proportion.
Tech bro prompt engineers would not be able to apply their text prompts to other contexts.
But he is actually playing checkers and already ate half of his pieces.
The services will never change because consumers are lazy.
That is not true!
The services get more expensive and the quality goes down.
Your banana slug is ripe and almost ready to make banana slug bread!
Specifically her ability to marry who she wants, because everything is about her.
“Get in the Eva, Shinji!”
Now now, “Hope [Harris] loses” does not necessarily mean “hope Trump wins”.
Since that was the only person she could plausibly lose to, yes it fucking does mean that.
Guess we just let for profit companies and authoritarian states suck up all the data on everyone whether it works or not then.
Limiting total time spent on something is one of the parental control options. It isn’t just blocking things 100%.
Limiting total time spent on something is one of the parental control options. It isn’t just blocking things 100%.
There is no problem to solve that hasn’t already been addressed with parental controls.
Thanos was wrong in theory.
Halving all life doesn’t change the life to resources ratio. Even halving all sapient life doesn’t solve anything when populations will just continue to grow.
I quoted the amendment, which I am all in favor of. In fact, I am in favor of well regulated ownership by anyone who can pass a gun safety course. While I am in favor of background checks to reduce the chances of someone buying a gun when they are not eligible due to a violent felony or similar reasons (part of that well regulated thing), I am against tracking those background checks or a gun registry.
My dislike of stupid court rulings that contradict the amendment is based on what is written and putting it on individuals who want to play rambo doesn’t mean I don’t like the basic concept.
Yes, they tossed it back down because the state wasn’t focused enough on freeze peach over child torture when they regulated medical care.
They literally ruled that speech is more important than torturing children.
Jackson’s dissent is correct:
“The Constitution does not pose a barrier to reasonable regulation of harmful medical treatments just because substandard care comes via speech instead of a scalpel,” she wrote.
“What was really meant was…” is how they turned the second amendment, clearly about forming a militia for national defense, into being about personal self defense.
A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.
The first half I made bold is what the second half is based on. It is about having an armed society so it can be a well regulated militia. Now those same words just mean people get to have guns for whatever reason they want and not because they are part of a militia.
In this case, they are pretending that “subject to the jurisdiction thereof” means something completely fictional based on what they want it to mean blatantly contradicting over a century of clear reinforcement of what it literally means.
The best part about using reddit is that LLMs don’t understand sarcasm or spamming meme, which are a significant portion of reddit comments. There are so many John Backflip level trolling memes out there.