• metallic_substance@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      3 days ago

      Well, if you’re arguing from the position of god not exiting in the first place, then the counterargument could be that god decided to give the pope lung cancer to test him and thus make him a stronger man. If he dies from the cancer then… well… It’s still god’s plan. Sorry, you lose either way (heavy, HEAVY sarcasm meant)

      • SkyezOpen@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        Yep, a classic: suffering is part of God’s plan. The real question is whether God could pull off his grand plan with less suffering. Is it really necessary to give infants leukemia to accomplish his goal? If yes, he’s not all powerful. If no, he’s an asshole. Then they sidestep to free will and sin, at which point you ask them who decided the consequences of sin in the first place.

        • Tower@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          Children’s bone cancer is my go to, but yeah

          Image of bone cancer. Not gore, but looks incredibly painful

          spoiler

    • JackbyDev@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      The Christian response would be that God’s plan is always right. Even apart from that, I don’t think the lifespan of a pope would imply that God did something “wrong”. It’s not like the pope is getting picked to rule for as long as possible or something. It’s not like a monarchy where people say things like “this dynasty shall rule for a thousand generations!”

    • CrimeIsLegalNow@ani.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      You realize the types you’re making fun of would just say he’s being punished for not being MAGA enough, right?