The law was clear: Donald Trump’s Department of Justice was required to disclose all investigative files on Jeffrey Epstein by 19 December 2025, with rare exceptions.
One month after this deadline mandated by Congress’s Epstein Files Transparency Act, however, Trump’s justice department has not complied with this law, prompting questions about when – and whether – authorities will ever release investigative documents about the late sex offender.
Justice department attorneys said in a 5 January Manhattan court filing that they had posted approximately 12,285 to DoJ’s website, equating to some 125,575 pages, under this legislation’s requirements. They said in this same letter that justice department staff had identified “more than 2 million documents potentially responsive to the Act that are in various phases of review”.
That these DoJ’s disclosures apparently comprise a drop in the bucket – and have done little to shed light on how Epstein operated with apparent impunity for years – has roiled survivors’ advocates and lawmakers. They include attorney Spencer Kuvin, who has represented dozens of Epstein’s survivors.
They note that the Department of Justice has also flouted another requirement of this act, which requires that the attorney general provide a report identifying “categories of records released and withheld and summarizing all redactions and their legal bases” within 15 days of their disclosure deadline.
“To date, no such report has been provided. Without it, there is no authoritative accounting of what records exist, what has been withheld, or why, making effective oversight and judicial review far more difficult,” they wrote. “Put simply, the DOJ cannot be trusted with making mandatory disclosures under the Act.”



I agree but I suspect his base doesn’t. They love all this power projection and hostility, and the Epstein stuff is something that they’re unusually not in agreement with the administration on.
That being said, I think it detracts from the real implications of these actions if they’re only referred to as a distraction. These are very, very likely things that Trump wants to implement regardless and not just something that’s done to shift the attention elsewhere.
They could release video footage of Trump raping an infant to death and his base would find a way to justify it.
Anyone who thinks Trump will suffer any consequences from being implicated in the files is delusional.
(smart) people really don’t care about trump, he will be short-lived even if he makes it through this 2nd term. it’s about cutting out the rot behind him, cults of personality rarely extend past the cult-head.
I really do care about Trump, and I don’t care whether you think I’m smart.
He may be old, and even unwell, but the amount of damage he’s doing every day / week / month is obscene. Just in the last week he’s done significant lasting harm to trade relations with Europe.
If he withdraws the US from NATO he will have done irreparable damage to global security.
I don’t have a lot of faith that the harm he’s doing can be undone.
i just dont think it’ll be materially different with vance in place of trump, the national distraction/embarrassment aspect might be less but the bts christofacist shit would be much more precise
You might be right, I dont know.
Trump seems to have absolute control of the republican party. Its not clear whether Vance would have that same grip.