Isn’t Authoritarian bullshit fun?

/s

Understand understand. Understand understand. Understand understand the concept of love.

Nope. Don’t fucking do this. Do not comply in advance.

Cause they don’t want to have to force corpos to get age verification on the ludicrous number of IoT devices that run Linux, but cover their ass in making it not seem that way.

Oh sorry. I mean… cause they’re, like, open-source and how could you even enforce that?

Other, better people have said this before.

Gotta sue for those, this is just charges being dropped.

No, I have the proof in this article of wrongdoing. Your argument hinges on this not being all the evidence used, sans proof. You’re the person asserting a claim without proof.

So yeah, you’re a pedo. Got it!

Why was this man’s license plate being tracked for him to be caught? If you can answer that question in a manner that implies the cops had suspicion before they did the license plate tracking then you’ve got a strong case that this gentleman’s 4th amendment rights weren’t violated.

But I don’t think there’s any way they knew to search his car where the first step wasn’t “Flock told us he goes to Michigan a lot” which, again, isn’t a crime nor is it suspicious. But more importantly, it means that the only justification for the search of the car came from an UNNECESSARY search of all the activities of all drivers in Brown County.

Yes, in public there’s no expectation of privacy, but that argument hinges on the idea that cops need to spend resources to follow people’s movements when they’re suspects in a crime. Recent SCOTUS cases have drawn the line that full sweep movement tracking could violate the fourth.

But the bigger deal here is how they knew where to be and when. They setup a sting because Flock pinged that he’d just crossed the border back from MI. So, based on Flock’s evidence that this man travels to MI, they began tracking his whereabouts OUTSIDE OF THEIR JURISDICTION. Reminder that reasonable suspicion of law breaking is required for tracking like that, but, more importantly, so is a warrant.

https://youtu.be/gmnL_Y9CsI0 video on Flock’s “legality” especially concerning unwarranted mass surveillance

Absence of evidence may be enough for you

I’m gonna hand you back this part of your argument. Trying to force me to prove a negative is a bad look and screams of desperation. But, if you do want to go down that road, I will remind you that you’ve never given proof that you’re not a pedophile and I find that very suspicious. Only pedophiles don’t have proof that they’re not pedophiles.

They arrested him in Wisconsin after laying an extremely illegal search trap for him.

They deeply broke the 4th amendment while doing nothing more than profiling a man for traveling. They then laid in wait for him to return to the city and performed an illegal search (illegal because the justification for said search comes from a 4th amendment violation) once they had him. Without the illegal search prior, they had no justification for the search that actually found the pot.

Even though he broke the law, there’s no way the conviction will stick because the cops fucked their case by doing this shit.

“Oh, that’s-”

The speaker was crushed as OPs sudden extreme gravity ripped the earth asunder

You’re one of today’s lucky 10,000

It usually doesn’t, but also you have to take entities to court to test that. Most people don’t bother (yay capitalism! Where you can do openly illegal shit so long as no one can afford to tell you no!)

No. It is super illegal but didn’t you know that as long as you tape a sign that says “digital” or equivalent on an illegal thing, is suddenly a new thing and can’t be handled with the current rules. Everyone knows that! It’s why we have illegal taxis, hotels, and spy networks all in the palm of your hand. Isn’t the future great?

No, cause both enlisted and officer tracks still experience the principle. It’s not like you don’t get promoted to leadership in the enlist track, it’s just limited how far those promotions can go.

Oh yeah. Russia, historically great for indigenous groups.

Don’t care, man. Facebook made me hate the whole concept of selling my friends and family to a corpo syndicate in order to… communicate with them. I can text, man.

“New tactics” aka even more egregious crimes

No, it means the monopoly exists at the meat processing step. Owning all the land for cattle raising was expensive, so investors targeted the processing step instead, fucking over both the ranchers and the consumers.