In the English speaking world, not really, no. People with little firearms experience incorrectly refer to cartridges as bullets, but they are exactly that: incorrect.

My point is if something is impossible to do, that doesn’t make it difficult. It makes it impossible. Those are two different things.

That law was added when guns were so imprecise it was difficult to hit the broadside of a barn from inside the barn.

How is that not blatantly false? Piss off troll.

They weren’t idiots either. They weren’t stupid enough to think technology was static and would never improve, firearms technology was literally improving during their lifetime. They wrote the constitution the way they did deliberately. The constitution was meant to be a living document, true, but the only reason to change that amendment is, simply put, fascism.

I do know what I’m talking about. Your link is incorrect. What you’re showing me a photo of is an ammo cartridge. A cartridge contains a bullet, a casing, gunpowder, and a primer. The part labelled projectile is the bullet. Not all projectiles are bullets, but all bullets are projectiles. The (typically brass) casing houses the gunpowder and the bullet is seated in the opening of the casing, with the primer at the closed end. All these components together is called a cartridge. You can buy bullets on their own, sure, but if you just buy a box of bullets all you are getting is the projectile. If you buy a box of ammo, you are buying a box of cartridges.

That law was added when guns were so imprecise it was difficult to hit the broadside of a barn from inside the barn.

That’s blatantly false. Timothy Murphy killed a British officer during the Revolutionary War at a distance of 300-400 yards. They absolutely had the capability of precise marksmanship at the time the constitution was written. Repeating rifles were not a foreign concept either. They weren’t common yet, but there was no reason for them to believe the technology wouldn’t be improved.

No, you are. Literally read the goddamn title of the thread.

They enforce plenty of draconian shit just fine, I think they can find a way.

If they represent public affairs, they should be beholden to the electorate. Fuck this hiding behind private institution bullshit.

That’s the entirety of this thread, that if companies are being reimbursed, then people should also be reimbursed.

And the company should be legally held responsible go reimbursing its customers.

Everybody involved should be at 0 tarrifs. Why should Nintendo be +1 and all their customers be -1?

There’s records of customers buying products at inflated costs due to the tariffs as well. They absolutely can refund people if they get a refund.

The company paid for it initially, but the customer actually paid for it.

Lmao, what? The fucking death penalty? This shit is so backwards man.

Just because something is legal that doesn’t make it just.

A bullet is a projectile. It doesn’t contain gunpowder in any amount. You don’t even know what youre talking about.

Can a psycho fuck any other way?

Its spelled Sudoku.

CMV: people who preach at other people unsolicited are just projecting. What do you have to repent for motherfucker?