• OBJECTION!@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    5 hours ago

    It’s up to politicians to decide how to use those weapons, not engineers.

    Exactly how far does this extend? Because a lot of people involved in supporting the Nazi war effort said the exact same thing.

    If you go around solving every problem you’re asked to with no concern for who’s asking or why, that’s how you wind up developing Zyklon B.

    Giving a gun to a murderer is the same as pulling the trigger. Giving artillery to a murderer is too.

    • ExLisper@lemmy.curiana.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      4 hours ago

      Great, so let’s disarm unilaterally. I’m sure Russia and China will do the same.

      Such a childish take…

      • OBJECTION!@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        39 minutes ago

        Why should we demand countries that are only spending 1/3 of what we spend disarm? No, let’s focus on having the most militaristic country in the world, the one that spends as much as the next 9 countries combined, on having that country reduce spending and stop trying to dominate the entire world through military force.

        And then we can spend some of that money on giving me healthcare! Everybody wins! Well, except for the corporate executives, corrupt politicians, and their chauvanistic bootlickers.