In 1958, French paediatrician Marthe Gautier helped produce the laboratory evidence linking Down’s syndrome to an extra chromosome at the Armand-Trousseau children’s hospital in Paris.

Her contribution became the subject of a long-running dispute after Jérôme Lejeune emerged as the best-known figure associated with the discovery, while a 2014 assessment by France’s medical research institute stressed Gautier and department head Raymond Turpin’s indispensable roles.

In 1956, researchers established that human cells normally contain 46 chromosomes, prompting Turpin to investigate a chromosomal cause for Down’s syndrome.

Gautier had learned cell-culture techniques during a scholarship at Harvard in 1955 and brought that expertise back to Paris.

Gautier developed a method for growing cells from children with the condition, using rooster plasma and her own blood serum.

The preparations made it possible to examine chromosomes, although the laboratory lacked equipment to photograph the smallest structures clearly.

Who first counted 47 chromosomes remains contested. Gautier’s 2009 account described her role in preparing and examining the cells, while Lejeune’s laboratory notebook, cited by his foundation, records a 47-chromosome observation in a child with Down’s syndrome on 22 May 1958. A second entry on 13 June referred to a different condition.

The foundation also points to a letter Turpin sent Lejeune on 27 October 1958, saying Gautier and another researcher, Mrs Massé, were still obtaining counts of 46.

Although the notebook evidence challenges the claim that Gautier alone made the first count, it does not diminish her role in developing the cell-culture method.

Lejeune presented the finding at McGill University in 1958, before the research was published in January 1959, listing him first, Gautier second and Turpin last, with Gautier’s surname misspelled as ‘Gauthier’; a second communication followed in March.

  • neukenindekeuken@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    14 hours ago

    Oh boy, do I have a bunch of other wikipedia articles to show you for you to have a TIL post at least once a day for the next ten years or so.

    • lobut@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      17 hours ago

      Yup, fuel to people that claim shit like men are better and women don’t invent stuff and need to be baby makers. It’s always sad because you know the people that believe that shit haven’t invented anything themselves. You can claim anything when you rewrite history.

    • abbadon420@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      44
      ·
      1 day ago

      That was Rosalind Franklin. There are many women througout history that were skipped or even excluded from nobel-prize nominations.It’s a dark stain on the science community. It even has a name https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Matilda_effect

      I recently listened to a podcast about Jocelyn Brunel, who got excluded for the nobel prize because she was “just a student” and a woman. She discovered pulsars. Her colleagues called it the “no-brunell prize” after that. She won a large prize recently and donated it all to the advacement of women in science.

      • WorldsDumbestMan@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        14 hours ago

        Why is it that all the worst people are filling up science institutions? Like the guy who defended Epstein?

        Is there a name for this phenomena?

    • nymnympseudonym@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      23
      ·
      1 day ago

      Same for Emily Noether, who frankly deserves at least as much fame as Einstein for unifying deep concepts.

      And for Henrietta Leavitt, who actually discovered the expansion of the universe and told Hubble about it.

    • bacon_pdp@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 day ago

      Not exactly.

      Photo 51 was taken by Raymond Gosling.

      Gosling was a PhD student working under Rosalind Franklin at King’s College London.

      So it depends on how you define who gets credit when the advancement was the result of thousands of people working together for decades.