In November 2015, world leaders descended on Paris to negotiate a historic agreement to limit global warming. But on the summit’s opening day, attention turned to a private citizen slouched awkwardly in a chair on stage: Bill Gates.

Gates, with his characteristic flop of sandy hair, grinned impishly as President Barack Obama called him a “visionary” and a “driving force” behind a pair of pledges that both saw as key to the larger agreement. First the world’s largest economies would double their spending on research into clean-energy technologies. Then investors like Gates would back the startups that emerged. The Microsoft cofounder had already enlisted two dozen other billionaires to join the effort.

For Gates, who’d become increasingly consumed by this unprecedented threat to human well-being, the moment marked his arrival as a leading figure in the fight against climate change.

“If we back over 50 different breakthrough approaches, we know that several of those will give us the solution that we need,” Gates said during his own speech. He would invest at least $2 billion of his own money in companies developing geothermal wells, new kinds of nuclear reactors and machines that pull carbon from the air, to name just a few.

With much less fanfare, however, Gates has put more than double that amount into a very dirty, old-school industry. At the time of the Paris summit, he was already the dominant shareholder of America’s No. 2 landfill operator, Republic Services. He has since increased his stake to 38% of the company, a position worth $29 billion.

  • IninewCrow@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    edit-2
    4 hours ago

    The ultra wealthy want the world to change … but with very strict conditions

    • they first and foremost want to keep and maintain all their wealth and privilege and power
    • they want everyone else to do the dirty work
    • they want everyone else to pay for it all (they’ll throw in a bit of money to get it started but they want everyone to pay for it all eventually)
    • they want to benefit directly from the changes so that they can exponentially grow the wealth they already have
    • they want to take credit for making it happen
    • Nola@piefed.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      4 hours ago

      In summary, they want the world as it largely exists now but they don’t want the poor reputation, political backlash, civilian unrest, and for some of them, the personal guilt associated with the exploitation they built their fortunes off of and need to sustain to keep it.