On a Friday in March, employees at an international technology foundation received a 38-page document outlining leadership’s vision for the foundation for the next 1,000 years.
If you’re reporting facts on something that is wildly unfortunate and bizarre, it’s not the facts that are off, it’s* the thing you’re reporting on that’s off.
Again, I want to know what’s going on with this. Is this another Thiel? Do you know anything about the company executives? I don’t own crypto so I don’t really follow it.
It’s like the Linux foundation issuing a vision that the software should remain free. Members of foundation should pledge towards that mandate. If a scumbag is going to rug pull it to a commercial license, violating the pledge, they will probably reneg on any voluntary penalties that they also pledged for violating the first pledge.
While its all a bit dramatic, the game theory of the drama should have been explained better, in that drama for traitors traitoring will include their pledge to kill themselves which as traitors will just have to dismiss, while enduring drama.
If you’re reporting facts on something that is wildly unfortunate and bizarre, it’s not the facts that are off, it’s* the thing you’re reporting on that’s off.
Again, I want to know what’s going on with this. Is this another Thiel? Do you know anything about the company executives? I don’t own crypto so I don’t really follow it.
It’s like the Linux foundation issuing a vision that the software should remain free. Members of foundation should pledge towards that mandate. If a scumbag is going to rug pull it to a commercial license, violating the pledge, they will probably reneg on any voluntary penalties that they also pledged for violating the first pledge.
While its all a bit dramatic, the game theory of the drama should have been explained better, in that drama for traitors traitoring will include their pledge to kill themselves which as traitors will just have to dismiss, while enduring drama.
Yeah this story is weird and confusing.