CIA wants this.

I tried but nothing happened when I clicked “show full article.”

Except for Gaza, Iran, Lebanon, Syria, anywhere the empire and their proxies touch. And the empire.

And that’s went their reporting should always be nitpicked under bright lights with an ectron microscope.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reuters

Reuters (/ˈrɔɪtərz/ ⓘ ROY-tərz) is a British news agency wholly owned by Thomson Reuters, a multinational information conglomerate.[4][5] It employs around 2,500 journalists and 600 photojournalists in 200 locations and 165 countries worldwide writing in 16 languages.[6][7] Reuters is one of the largest news agencies in the world.[8][9]

Well I gave you a direct link because that’s what they want. You can edit the post to use it.

Edit 9. No link shorteners or news aggregators. All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.

The mods are going to delete this. Here is the direct link.

https://www.livescience.com/health/cancer/1-in-8-cancer-cases-are-caused-by-infections-underscoring-the-importance-of-vaccines-experts-say

No they didn’t.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marriage_age_in_the_United_States

Paper calendar, pencil.

“Inference is hard. I quit!” 🤓

🤓

No I’m addressing the Marshall project, en toto.

I’m glad an attempted genocide of communists, Jews, LGBTQ, Roma and others were averted, while also noting that only a few Nazis were stopped, and the bulk funneled into the USA, UK, Canada, Argentina, and other states. Germany is not in great shape and finds itself kissing the bigger boot for fear of retaliation.

Because US intervention began with the Taliban. 🙄

Shared verb. The topic you took issue with was the Marshall Plan. Are you high?

Maybe the better lesson is for those pinning their hopes on the latest, greatest liberal.

No. Vietnam is most assuredly better off with communism. A lot of sexpats enjoy the low cost of living and services available.

No, I said it correctly.

From: https://www.ucpress.edu/books/the-united-states-of-war/paper (I’m sure you can search it up, if you CBA):

“In geopolitical terms,” writes historian Alfred McCoy, the United States "became history’s most powerful empire because it was the first, after a millennium of incessant struggle, to control ‘both ends of Eurasia,’ " with bases from the British Isles through Southeast Asia to Japan. To guard the empire, the U.S. military had 2.6 million active duty troops; 2,650 ships and 7,195 Navy combat aircraft; 15,000 Air Force fighters, bombers, and transport aircraft; and nuclear weapons ready for launch from the air, the land, and the sea.9 The growing nuclear weapons arsenal of the Soviet Union played some role in the base proliferation: more U.S. bases meant more targets and dispersed forces. The growing fear of a nuclear-armed Soviet Union likewise played an important role in governments agreeing to a U.S. presence. “Viewed from one perspective, this was an act of [U.S.] benevolence,” writes foreign bases expert Amy Holmes. The United States was providing protection. On the other hand, other nations were ceding a significant degree of sovereignty to the United States (while also turning themselves into targets for Soviet missiles).10

In Portugal “the supersensitive question of Portuguese sovereignty was constantly being raised before our negotiators,” reported Col. Lawrence C. Coddington, Air Force Deputy Assistant for Air Bases. “Every point of issue revolved around the question of sovereignty and were [sic] resolved only after lengthy discussions on many proposed drafts.” Coddington acknowledged that “the agreement as written does not meet the ultimate in Air Force desires.” But, he continued, "it must be kept in mind that the Air Force cannot hope to achieve its desired ultimate in operating rights in small foreign countries purely because of that country’s jealousy over its sovereignty."11

The sensitivity of the Portuguese government about its loss of sovereignty was common among countries hosting U.S. bases. The rapid requests for the Yankees to leave after World War II revealed this. Even with growing fears of a clash between East and West, base negotiations were often difficult. Generally, they revolved around the degree to which U.S. forces would enjoy “extraterritoriality”—that is, the extent to which U.S. forces would be free from local laws, free from local prosecution for committing any crimes, and free to conduct military operations without restraint or consultation with the host nation. In other words, negotiations focused on how much effective sovereignty the U.S. military would have on foreign soil and thus how much sovereignty a host country would give up. Even with the United States’ closest allies, such as Great Britain, sovereignty would long remain a “focus of tension,” especially when it came to crimes committed by troops.

Non - Paywalled https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/other/tsa-officers-now-not-allowed-to-sit-down-while-checking-boarding-passes-and-ids/ar-AA2ddioI

The Marshall Plan was horrible for those under it’s subjugation. Versailles was also USA rubbish.

Japan wouldn’t have been needlessly nuked and the white man’s burden doctrine seriously needs to be, since it’s ever only a wealth and resource extraction policy.