• njordomir@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    1 hour ago

    I’m gonna forward this article to DuckDuckGo and Kagi. I imagine they could help the school district do what Google can’t.

  • Wildmimic@anarchist.nexus
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    35
    ·
    4 hours ago

    This will backfire hard. It will create students who do not conflate Google with search.

    Never interrupt your enemy when he is in the middle of making a big mistake.

    • shalafi@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      4 hours ago

      I’ve read that young folks have dropped the term and now say “search it”. I’ll have to ask my young ones. Unfortunately, they often answer in ways they think daddy wants to hear, despite my admonitions to stop that shit.

  • abbadon420@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    5 hours ago

    Good, keep shooting your self.
    Schools all across the world are rejecting AI, this will open the road for alternative search engines.

    • shalafi@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      4 hours ago

      Another commenter said that the IT admin would simply change the search engine behind the omnibar. Easy money and nothing really changes except the kids betting better search results.

  • assaultpotato@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    5 hours ago

    Search should be a public utility at this point.

    But then again I don’t know how you’d neutrally maintain a search algorithm.

    Regardless, depending on a private company for something so fundamental to societal functions seems bad.

    • milbyte@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      5 hours ago

      the way it worked originally, pagerank. SEO, will never cease sadly; goodhart’s law n all, but it’s better than what we have now

    • shalafi@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      4 hours ago

      You want the government running search?! That’s an absolute horror show; you see the impossibility of neutrality.

      Here in Florida, “homosexual teen” would lead to sites about conversion camps. We might just score a Democrat in the governor’s mansion today, so that would change. And then change again. Imagine the non-stop public fight over what is and is not appropriate to show in a search. AH! (I’m actually having a giggle thinking about such fighting. “Trannie” would lead to results about transmissions one year, a transexual slur the next, banned altogether the next.)

      • Wildmimic@anarchist.nexus
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 hours ago

        At least there would be a non-stop public fight over it, instead of just having to swallow whatever the corpos which captured the government want to put in their search result.

          • Wildmimic@anarchist.nexus
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            3 hours ago

            If search was provided by a government run by a functioning country with strong democratic roots - AKA the west excluding the US - political parties messing with search would cause them to lose voters. Bribery only increases that effect in an actually working structure.

  • expatriado@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    5 hours ago

    google: ai summaries are hurting our advertisement revenue

    also google: we’ll block you if you reject our ai

    • shalafi@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 hours ago

      As someone else pointed out, the IT admin will just change the search engine behind the omnibar. Speaking as a sysadmin, I wouldn’t put up with a broken search bar, I’d simply fix it. Hell, even consumers have the power to change it in Chrome!

  • GreenKnight23@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    3 hours ago

    sounds like a great opportunity to drop google from education infrastructure and rely on a more balanced approach of books, papers, and physically handing shit in.

    dunno. worked for me when I was in school.

    • shalafi@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      4 hours ago

      Had to switch to DDG on my phone. I rarely browse the internet that way, but when I was sitting in my flea market booth the ads were fucking unbearable.

  • the_riviera_kid@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    3 hours ago

    To me the title reads as, “Allow us to abuse you or we wont let you be abused by us”.

    In other words the best solution is to reject both anyway, Fuck ai.