Artificial-intelligence systems such as large language models (LLMs) can exhibit behaviour that seems strikingly intelligent. This has led many people, including some experts, to wonder whether these systems could have some form of consciousness — the capacity for subjective experience. However, we think that existing AI systems are not conscious, and that, along current trajectories of development, they are not likely to become conscious. Greater clarity about whether AI could become consciousness will be crucial as society grapples with the challenges posed by this increasingly powerful technology.

  • magnue@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    30
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    19 hours ago

    Nobody can even agree on a concrete definition of consciousness so I’m not going to bother reading these ‘reasons’.

    • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      18 hours ago

      Nobody can even agree on a concrete definition of consciousness

      Not only is that false, it doesn’t make logical sense…

      Lots of people agree on a different definitions of consciousness.

      And most of the ones educated on the topic all agree on the same thing.

      A bunch of people who never bothered to try and learn about something not understanding it, doesn’t mean anything.

      • Rhaedas@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        18 hours ago

        That’s because there’s different levels of such a thing. Way too many people use the term “sentient” (even me) and yet that’s not even what AGI is aiming for. “Sapient” is the right word. And I doubt there’s solid consensus on what and how it occurs within the fields of experts.

        But I’m not an expert, so I wouldn’t pretend to know. I have seen debates between people who do know more, and the fact there’s debates concludes it’s not settled at all.