• kkj@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    1 day ago

    You know what? I’m OK with a panopticon specifically for convicted stalkers. I realize the potential for a slippery slope, but I think the risk is worth it in this one case.

    • WhyJiffie@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      12 hours ago

      then you’ll realize the even bigger slippery slope when you reread the article and discover it is for suspected stalkers

    • greyscale@lemmy.grey.ooo
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      30
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      1 day ago

      It wont stay confined to stalkers, it’ll start being used for poor people in general.

      Trangressions like being late to work will be held against you. You know they will.

      • ironhydroxide@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        22 hours ago

        Don’t know about you, but I’m already reprimanded if I’m late for work, whether they’re tracking my real time location or not.

      • Axolotl@feddit.it
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        22 hours ago

        uses data from court-ordered electronic ankle monitors

        Soo, your line of thought says that we are all gonna gef an ankle monitor? At that point i doubt the app is the kickstarter of the problem…

    • frongt@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      22 hours ago

      The article says suspects, not convicts.

      And all this means is they’ll be limited to online stalking.