• dogslayeggs@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    3 hours ago

    I don’t know how they can make this legal in a Two Party Consent state. Even if the raw recording is not made available to the user, it is still recording people without their consent. Additionally, I don’t know if “summary recaps” of recordings fall under the same laws as raw audio recordings.

    As much as I would absolutely love to be able to go back and re-listen to conversations to make sure I remembered important information (my wife gets pissed at me for forgetting things all the time), this is a privacy nightmare.

  • CalemitousVariantK@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    2 hours ago

    So, it listens all day, records everything you say or anyone near you says (regardless of their permission), and transmits it to a central server for processing, then returns an AI slop edition?

    And those who have one paid full price?

  • TrippinMallard@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    3 hours ago

    Great, now we can shout questionable phrases around these wiretaps so their owners’ AI puts them on a watchlist.

  • gedfromgont@piefed.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    11 hours ago

    Where’s all the people from here now who praised Apple and vowed their next phone will be an Iphone after Google announced their mandatory developer verification?

  • TDCN@feddit.dk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    13 hours ago

    Give me the source code or it’s not running locally on device!