• stoly@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    39
    ·
    17 hours ago

    I believe that by international law all vessels have to offer assistance to someone in distress.

        • M0oP0o@mander.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          19
          ·
          17 hours ago

          And this is the flaw, they pay them a lot to take the fall as part of the job. Plenty will do so with a smile on their faces and international law and decency suffers.

          • stoly@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            8
            ·
            17 hours ago

            Agreed, this is definitely what happened. There is probably also a sense of being able to do anything you like since your boss is rich.

            • M0oP0o@mander.xyz
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              8
              ·
              17 hours ago

              Not just a sense, a very real ability. This might mean they can’t captain a ship anymore, but unlikely to see any real punishment.

              • FrostyTheDoo@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                16 hours ago

                Even without knowing the law in detail, I’m certain rich people have a (designed) loophole around it. He’ll captain another ship if he wants to

                • M0oP0o@mander.xyz
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  7
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  16 hours ago

                  The captain is not the rich guy here. These super yachts tend to get captains near the end of their career who know the deal. They get nice paychecks to do shit like this and then take the fall if needed, that is the loophole.

                  • FrostyTheDoo@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    5
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    15 hours ago

                    He captains one of the most important yachts in the world and you think he’s not “the rich guy”? He’s not as rich as his boss (no one is) but he doesn’t live by the same rules as you and me, and I’d bet you he’s not done captaining ships over this, unless he wants to be

    • lookitsjustin@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      edit-2
      17 hours ago

      You’re correct about this. I was just looking it up myself.

      There is indeed international maritime law governing vessels, and they must proceed with all possible haste to distress signals. Unfortunately, there are two problems here as I understand the situation:

      1. Believe it if you want to or not but - the people operating Zuckerberg’s yacht claim they hadn’t heard or noticed the distress signal at the time
      2. The Coast Guard - who, importantly, the stranded skiff had initially contacted - didn’t consider their situation to be worthy of “distress” and thus Zuckerberg and his yachtspeople didn’t violate any regulations or laws

      Zuckerberg’s yachtfucks apparently said that they noticed the distress signal eventually, but by the time they had, the Coast Guard had already arranged assistance for the skiff.

      So, sadly, for those of us who want to see the billionaires get their comeuppances, I don’t think we’ll see it here.