the driver of a Tesla who crashed into a house in June had pressed the accelerator pedal to 100%, overriding the company’s Full Self-Driving (Supervised) software.
Yes the naming convention is dumb but it wasn’t at fault here.
If it’s anything like the e-pedals used in Subaru and Honda vehicles, they should have two different independent position sensors in the pedal. The ecu monitors both, and the value from both must match. If there is a discrepancy, it uses the lower value or zero.
So it’s extremely unlikely the pedal could malfunction in a way to show 100% pressed.
Yup. It’s completely false advertising and dangerous to call something Full Self-Driving or Autopilot when it clearly does not do what the common understanding of the names imply.
I think it is very clear from what they wrote that they want Tesla’s advertising practices, such as calling their driver aids “Full Self-Driving” to stop, since it creates a false impression.
There’s a fair presence of free thinkers on Lemmy, I’m certain more than on Reddit, but still plenty of those looking to get some upvotes by regurgitating prevailing opinions when applicable.
It’s more related to the term “Full Self Driving”. It implies that the car is it’s own driver and therefore, that you are a passenger. A driver needs to always have control, even if some passenger messes with the pedals because he fell asleep.
So not actually FULL anything and Tesla should be held accountable for creating safety issues due to false advertising.
The driver is to blame for their actions, but not the only one to blame.
deleted by creator
Attached steering wheel (kind of)
Wheels may fall off: https://www.kbb.com/car-news/tesla-recalls-cybertruck-because-wheels-may-fall-off/
deleted by creator
Yes the naming convention is dumb but it wasn’t at fault here.
Can we trust that pedal didn’t malfunction this time and was actually pressed?
Even if that was the case, the driver should’ve pressed the brakes which would’ve overrode the accelerator.
Driver claims he was passed out, so his account isn’t necessarily conflicting with the pedal being pressed.
If it’s anything like the e-pedals used in Subaru and Honda vehicles, they should have two different independent position sensors in the pedal. The ecu monitors both, and the value from both must match. If there is a discrepancy, it uses the lower value or zero. So it’s extremely unlikely the pedal could malfunction in a way to show 100% pressed.
But I don’t know if Tesla does the same.
Drive-by-wire cars should all have two position sensors for the pedal. Teslas should have it too.
Yup. It’s completely false advertising and dangerous to call something Full Self-Driving or Autopilot when it clearly does not do what the common understanding of the names imply.
Good thing its called Full Self Driving (Supervised) then.
Are you suggesting the system should ignore full pedal press?
I think it is very clear from what they wrote that they want Tesla’s advertising practices, such as calling their driver aids “Full Self-Driving” to stop, since it creates a false impression.
Ah, so just botching in general and not at all related to the article in someone died.
If I want crass, I’ll go to Facebook.
There’s a fair presence of free thinkers on Lemmy, I’m certain more than on Reddit, but still plenty of those looking to get some upvotes by regurgitating prevailing opinions when applicable.
Lemmy never lets silly things like “relevance” get in the way of their hate boners.
Nor can they handle critism.
Tiny little egos with low emotional intelligence and no desire to grow, just point fingers and whine.
Who is “they” on a decentralised platform?
Who is being crass now?
I think you’re telling us more about yourself than anything else.
Critize away. I love the feedback.
Good try though.
It’s more related to the term “Full Self Driving”. It implies that the car is it’s own driver and therefore, that you are a passenger. A driver needs to always have control, even if some passenger messes with the pedals because he fell asleep.
Not at all and I have no idea how you got from ‘this name is misleading in a dangerous way’ to suggesting it work differently.
No, I get it. You could resist the opportunity.
I sure the victim and her family appreciates you guys using her death to drag Tesla despite being on a platform where almost everyone is in agreement.
I’m sure Tesla appreciates you defending them and a check will be in the mail soon.
I didn’t defend tesla at any point. You injected it that for your own personal narrative to make sense.