“We were at a village that Israeli settlers had destroyed, they had destroyed the school, they had destroyed that village, and we were just looking at it,” said Khanna, a progressive lawmaker from California in the U.S. House of ​Representatives.

“And these hoodlums come in with machine guns – M4, an American-made machine gun – and they detain us. They block off the road. And then they call the IDF and ​the IDF is on their side, not on the side of the Americans,” Khanna said, referring to the Israeli military.

An aide to ⁠Khanna who was in the group, Cameron Kasky, said they were held for more than an hour and made appeals to the U.S. Embassy in Jerusalem for help. A group ​of officers who appeared to be police eventually intervened, leading to their release, Kasky said.

  • doben@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    5 hours ago

    Yes, classic liberal Zionist rhetoric.

    Is the Democratic Party no longer a pro Israel party?

    We’re a party that believes in two states and peace. (…) Why aren’t we doing the Arab Peace Plan? Two states, you have a Palestinian state, which is demilitarized, and an Israeli state. That’s what we’re for, we should be for peace and we should be for justice in this region. (…) And yes, we need a secure Israel, but not an Israel led by Netanyahu, who killed 70.000 people in Gaza. (…) I’m for the Iron Dome technology, (…) I’m glad Israel has it.

    He’s towing the party line, and the Democratic Party is very much a Zionist organisation. He doesn’t like the optics of the genocide, blames the current regime and complains about the lost support of the younger generation and that a foreign prime minister sits in the holy US-American situation room, as only US-American presidents decide which war crimes (in the name of the USA) are to be made. He what’s to reduce open pro Israel spending, as he’s advocating America First ideology.

    He’s supporting the Zionist project. Stop coping.

    • wheezy@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      5 hours ago

      Let them praise him. He doesn’t have to be an antizionist. He’s a symbol of antizionism here. That’s whats being praised.

      Like, I have my criticisms of the “two state - right to exist” Liberals. But, what did you expect progress to look like comrade? The same Liberals that spent years talking about October 7th in every sentence and “right to defend itself”. Those liberals are being forced to acknowledge the crimes of Israel. This is a win. You’re making those that advocate for Palestinians look unreasonable and irrational.

      I understand being upset at these libs. I understand why you still call him a Zionist. But, my friend, please, we have a long way to go still; criticizing a Congressman felt a fraction of a fraction of the oppression Palestinians feel every day in the West Bank. It’s not productive in this context. There are plenty of context to criticize him. The libs see this and dislike Israel. Just let that be the discussion.

      Apartheid South Africa ended when the liberals of the West were finally forced by activist and leftist into performative things just like this. This is a good sign. Let it happen.

      The liberals praising anything against Israel is good. We’re gonna have to cringe and bite our tongue when they treat Congressman as heroic for this. They are treating action against Israel as a positive. They are treating West Bank settlers as enemies. That’s amazing. Remember where we came from just three years ago; and where we are today. They’ll understand your current criticism one day. But this is not the context in which to educate them.

      • doben@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 hours ago

        Weird plea, sorry. This post has more than enough praise for the guy. I’m merely stating facts to rebuke naive or false narratives and to stop Zionist normalization. It’s not my job to appease Liberals or refrain from stating inconvenient truths.

        Some Libs might see this and break through. Let it happen.

        I don’t give a shit about congressmen in the imperialist core and I’m certainly not going to support controlled opposition of a system I reject outright. This system has to end. Fuck off.

    • Catoblepas@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 hours ago

      We could use more ‘Zionists’ that denounce genocide, apartheid, and go to Palestine to draw attention to the issue 🤷‍♂️ I’m not impressed by you trotting out the party position and blaming it on him personally, especially when he’s specifically calling out his own party in the article I guess you didn’t read. What has he said and done that’s Zionist?

      • doben@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        45 minutes ago

        Yes, it’s a good thing he calls the things that are the things that are, after almost 3 years of relentless barbarism, I’d say that’s approaching the bare minimum threshold. clap clap. I don’t give a shit, what position he takes in his Zionist party in order to shape the brand of said party to soften the outrage of their voter base and position himself as the reasonable presidential candidate.

        I believe that Zionism is self-determination of the Jewish people, and the right for Israel to exist. And I support that.

        He expresses support for a political ideology based on racism, aiming for an ethno-nationalist state.

        He repeatedly supports the notion of a “right to exist”, which is not a real thing; it’s only an argument in the context of defending the Zionist project. He’s proclaiming a right to exist for a settler colonial project based on ethnic cleansing and occupation of Palestinian land.

        (…) antisemitism is denying the idea of a Jewish state. And I reject those (…) premises.

        He expresses support for an etno-nationalist idea and also conflated anti-semitism with anti-zionism, which itself is anti-semitic.

        Previously, I quoted him expressing support for a two-state solution under Israeli term. A two-state solution that requires Palestinians to recognize Israel as a Jewish state enshrines its ethno-nationalist character. A “demilitarized” Palestinian state would lack genuine sovereignty while Israel retains full military capacity—making it a subordinate entity, not a state of equals. The very premise accepts the legitimacy of a Jewish state on Palestinian land.

        As I already quoted several things he said that are Zionist by definition in my previous comment, I suspect you don’t really have an understanding of what it even means. I’m not willing to descent into some back-and-forth with a person that’s primarily looking for excuses. Either learn, or stop pretending.

        On Zionism:

        Interview:

    • Maeve@kbin.earth
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      5 hours ago

      This is why people don’t leave their abusers. They keep listening to what they say, instead of watching what they do.

      • ultranaut@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 hour ago

        Ro Khanna literally went to the West Bank to experience things first hand where he was effectively kidnapped by Israeli terrorists and the IDF. Is that not doing?