• peoplebeproblems@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    This defeats the entire purpose of me having android

    Like I’m just going to switch to an iPhone now. Not because Apple is any better, but because I have more family with them.

    They took away our SD cards, they took away our removable batteries, they took away our headphone jacks. Now they’re taking away side loading apps, and that’s it. I’m done. The death of android.

    • Dremor@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      Removable batteries are coming back, as they become mandatory in the EU in 2027.
      Or you can already get one with a Fairphone (which also has SD card slot).
      As for the headphone jack, I’m afraid it won’t come back. Bluetooth alternatives are far better these days (I got both, so I know from experience), and good adapters (like Apple one) are barely more than $10.

      • raspberriesareyummy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        Bluetooth alternatives are far better these days

        Disputable.

        • they are cable-less, thus need to be charged separately
        • they are cable-less, thus it is easier to lose them
        • bluetooth implementation is a potential security vulnerability
        • transmission by radio will always be less energy efficient than transmission by wire
  • elucubra@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    Their arguments are kind of lame. To install APKs from outside the store is already an involved process that generally makes it harder for the uninformed to sideload. Make sideloading a bit harder, but possible. My xiaomi makes me wait and read warnings before installing APKs, for example.

    • floofloof@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      Side loading will still be possible but the apps themselves will need to be signed by the developer through Google, so Google ultimately still controls what can be installed. Maybe someone will crack it.

      • Porco@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        [Installing software] will still be possible but the apps themselves will need to be signed by the developer through Google, so Google ultimately still controls what can be installed. Maybe someone will crack it.

        Fixed that for you :-)

  • OboTheHobo@ttrpg.network
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    Something kind of concerning I just found - there’s an option for “limited distribution” which is “Intended for ‘students, hobbyists, and other personal use.’” One of the differences is the following:

    Has “capped number of apps and installs”(specific limits not disclosed)

    Doesn’t this imply there’s going to be global tracking of what apps people are installing even through sideloading or APKs? I can’t think of any other way to enforce this. They would have to know how many times people installed an app even when its not through any kind of app store or even from the internet at all.

    • Peffse@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      I’m pretty sure that was implemented a while ago. My install of VLC from F-Droid started showing up in Play Store’s update list.

      It couldn’t update since the signature didn’t match, but Google knew about it and included it anyway.

      • davidgro@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        That has just always been the case as long as the app in both stores uses the same package string. (Like org.blitzortung.android.app or org.videolan.vlc)