Iran will completely shut the strategic Strait ​of Hormuz if Trump executes threats to target Iranian energy facilities, ​the country’s Revolutionary Guards ​said in a statement on ⁠Sunday.

Trump on Saturday threatened ​to “obliterate” Iran’s power plants ​if Tehran did not fully reopen the Strait of Hormuz within ​48-hours, suggesting a significant ​escalation barely a day after he ‌talked ⁠about “winding down” the war, now in its fourth week.

In their Sunday statement Iran’s ​Revolutionary ​Guards ⁠also said companies with U.S. shares will ​be ‘completely destroyed’, if Iranian ​energy ⁠facilities were targeted by Washington and energy facilities ⁠in ​countries that host ​U.S. bases will be ‘lawful’ targets.

  • Aceticon@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    56 minutes ago

    Again, again and again Trump has shown that he follows the mindset of the bully, and he’s not even subtle or sophisticated about it: he threatens the other side to get something out of them and if they concede in some way (and merelly trying to accomodate him is seen as a concession), then after a while he’ll come at them again with further threats and demanding even more, whilst if they pushback he TACOes.

    We saw this with Europe: Trump does the whole Tariff thing and the EU Commission goes for a trade treaty to accomodate him. He kept on using Tariffs as threat against the EU and EU nations and didn’t took long for him to break that treaty. Meanwhile with the whole Greenland thing Europe started preparing for War and various European nations even sent military trigger forces there with the result that Trump TACOed.

    So what Iran is doing is exactly the correct response to somebody like him: “You do that and we’ll fuck your shit up even more than now”.

  • protist@retrofed.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    108
    ·
    1 day ago

    Trump assumes the IRGC are as dumb as him and the people he’s surrounded himself with, which is going to be catastrophic for how this goes for him. The IRGC are theocratic authoritarians who are not motivated by money, and he can’t conceive of this, so is clearly at a total loss as to how to handle the situation he has created

    • teyrnon@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      24
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      21 hours ago

      Just like the taliban, they aren’t motivated by money, that is insightful. They believe in something. Which means none of what the US can do will work on them, just as it didn’t with the taliban.

      • couldhavebeenyou@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        20 hours ago

        Worked on the Houthis though. Iran might be a tougher nut but they won’t sacrifice everything just to keep the Strait closed

        Then again, keeping power over the Strait is one of the most valuable pieces they still have on the board

        • idriss@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          12 hours ago

          What worked with Houthis? they kinda paused because genocide was kinda paused, their demands were met and they made it clear they are ready to join again to fight Epstein coalition.

          • Aceticon@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            10 minutes ago

            Oil AND gas.

            Which in turn will propagate to massive inflation in the West and possibly even problems with food production.

            Further they can fuck up the economy of the Gulf states which are allies of America to such a point that they end up in a death spiral from which they can’t recover.

          • pandapoo@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            13
            ·
            19 hours ago

            Closing the straight is multifaceted, but yeah, hurting the global economy is pretty much their only strategy due to the asymmetric nature of this war.

    • PhobosAnomaly@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      38
      arrow-down
      9
      ·
      24 hours ago

      I’m in a very very privileged position to be able to say this, but I am more than happy to pay a little bit extra at the pump and on my gas bill, just for that colossal fuckwomble to be shown up on the world stage for being a weapons grade tosser.

      Is it childish? Yes. Does it make me feel slightly better about the world? Also yes.

      • Krono@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        16
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        23 hours ago

        How long do you think that position will last?

        If energy infrastructure is destroyed, then “paying a little bit extra at the pump” is just the beginning. You will need to reduce your overall consumption by 15-20%.

        Remember the worst month of Covid? That’s the last time consumption was reduced so heavily. Now imagine that Covid lifestyle for 5 years as energy infrastructure is rebuilt.

        The joy of Trump’s downfall will not be enough to mask the real economic pain, unfortunately.

        • Aceticon@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          46 minutes ago

          It will accelerate energy transition.

          Even Fertilizers can be produced from renewable power (the hydrogen needed to make Amonia can be produced by electrolosys) and need not be made from gas.

          A short sharp pain might be in the best mid and long term interest for most of us, the environment and even parts of the Middle East itself (American interference there makes no sense if their Oil is just another unimportant mineral product) and it might even lead to the end of the USD Reserve Currency status.

        • CileTheSane@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          11 hours ago

          I also recognize my privileged position when I say this: I’m pretty sure I can tolerate it longer than the American Oligarchs will tolerate the loss of profit and start using those politicians they’ve purchased to put an end to it.

        • neukenindekeuken@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          13
          ·
          19 hours ago

          I feel like this would be a net win for the world. Everyone in the old empire is shooting themselves in the dick right now. If Iran stops the flow of oil, countries are going to be forced to very, very, very quickly invest heavily in renewables more than they already are.

          This idiot may have single handedly put a dent in global warming.

          • Aceticon@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            43 minutes ago

            Also an Oil Shock will almost certainly cause the AI bubble to burst, another win which also reduces global warming.

            Personally I would also love to see the ended of the Reserve Currency status for the USD, which is a possible consequence of the reduction in use of Oil (though it’s a less likely outcome in the short and even mid term).

            PS: By the way, great username.

        • grue@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          18
          ·
          22 hours ago

          Now imagine that Covid lifestyle for 5 years

          You say that as if I haven’t already been doing that.

      • PlaidBaron@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        23 hours ago

        Shit. Maybe the Alberta oil sands will finally be profitable! Haha, nah just kidding. They wont.

        • quackerjo@lemmy.wtf
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          19 hours ago

          They’ve been profitable for some time.

          A lot of people say they’re profitable at $60/barrel, but it’s more like between $50 and $80, depending on a bunch different factors, such as location and extraction method.

          But that’s only considering profitability in the terms of the current political system.

          If a new system came along that factored in harms to the environment, global warming, etc., they could go back to being unprofitable.

      • circuscritic@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        25
        ·
        21 hours ago

        So the tens of millions that are going to suffer famine across the global south, and the tens of thousands that will die in the third world hospitals without power, are price you’re willing to pay?

        Good to know.

        • PhobosAnomaly@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          17
          arrow-down
          7
          ·
          20 hours ago

          No you illiterate fuck, I said I’d pay a little more at the pump to see one of the most narcissistic and dangerous world leaders get knocked down a peg or two on the world stage.

          It’s soul destroying seeing the human cost of such a conflict, but your virtue signalling is both misplaced and ineffective.

          • berg@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            9 hours ago

            You don’t get one without the other. You don’t get to choose.

            • PhobosAnomaly@feddit.uk
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              8 hours ago

              I don’t disagree with you. It’s desperately sad.

              edit: I’d made the erroneous assumption this was a reply to a higher level comment.

              What is it that you’re suggesting here?

          • circuscritic@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            7
            arrow-down
            21
            ·
            edit-2
            20 hours ago

            You’re literally cheering for what you view as set of political upsides to war, and when I point out the rest of it, you get defensive.

            I wonder why.

            • PhobosAnomaly@feddit.uk
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              18
              arrow-down
              7
              ·
              20 hours ago

              I think this wondering you’re doing is the root cause of your problem.

              You’ve come up with an idea that I think there’s any political upsides to war based on some assumption that I haven’t quite figured out yet.

              You’ve come up with an entire “rest of it” which doesn’t really follow anything presented in the original post.

              Your “gotcha” moment doesn’t exist and is aimed at someone deeply saddened and angered by this pointless war.

              • circuscritic@lemmy.ca
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                7
                arrow-down
                23
                ·
                20 hours ago

                I appreciate you think that you have a point, and that it’s coherent, but you don’t, and it’s not.

    • protist@retrofed.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      31
      ·
      1 day ago

      They’ve been letting some ships through heading to India and China, and were talking about setting up a vetting system to allow more ships through

      • lemmyout@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        22 hours ago

        I thought they were mining the strait? How are they gonna control who hits the mines?

        • disablist@lemdro.id
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          19 hours ago

          They can’t, which is why I’m skeptical that they actually laid any mines.

          And it looks like at at least some level, the Trump administration assumed their only means of closing the straight was mines, which would have prevented them from using it as well.

          Iran’s new strategy of selective closure via missiles and drones clearly surprised the Trump administration.

  • danc4498@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    1 day ago

    I don’t know enough about all this, but how difficult is it for them to keep it shut? Do they just bomb any boat that tries to go through it?

    • teyrnon@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      20 hours ago

      No, they allow boats they clear through. Boats have obscured ownership, most are registered to the same three countries, little backwaters, so if they attack one specifically, it’s because they got word their ownership is billinaire US or Israel or connected.