• Khanzarate@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    35
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    6 days ago

    While they did manage to find something to check off the right forms as “is criminal”, those were years ago, and had no reason to do anything about it now, and no reason to suspect he would reoffend, given the nature of the crimes.

    So no, they’re in the wrong.

    • NauticalNoodle@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 hours ago

      A record of a DUI alone has for a long time been enough for Canadian border officials to bar Americans from entry. I don’t see why Canadians shouldn’t be held to that same standard.

    • verdare@piefed.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      23
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      6 days ago

      From our perspective, they’re in the wrong. From the perspective of people who are “tough on crime,” they’re in the right.

    • CaptDust@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 days ago

      I’m not defending this necessarily, but just saying Canada won’t let you cross the border even for a visit, if you’ve had a DUI ever. I find it unsurprising they’re digging into full history.

      • deltapi@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        5 days ago

        Because Canada considers DUIs a felony-level offence, regardless of how the home jurisdiction considers it.
        There are places in the states where it’s a misdemeanor and has a lower bar for conviction than the Canadian provinces have, but to the border entry requirements, a DUI is a DUI.
        That said, there are ways to become readmissible, but it’s a huge pain in the ass.