• melsaskca@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    5 hours ago

    “AI businesses are putting profits over sanity and safety”.

    Remove “AI” from that sentence and you’ll see that’s just more normal business practices that have been going on for decades.

    • seejur@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      10 minutes ago

      The real question is: what profit? It’s a sink hole in a hope to maximize reach

  • Lucidlethargy@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    11 hours ago

    This is many companies right now.

    Mine is run from the top down (all executives) by people who use LLM’s for fucking everything.

    Everyone fucking hates them at this point. We all think they are fucking trash.

    • stoly@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 hours ago

      or they see that things will collapse soon enough and are bailing like rats leaving a sinking ship

  • kescusay@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    136
    ·
    1 day ago

    And it’s not even working. Not one of the AI companies is profitable. So they’re putting the hope for profits some time in the future over sanity and safety.

    • bstix@feddit.dk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      10 hours ago

      I don’t think they even care about profits anymore.

      Billionaires live in the balance sheet, not the P/L statements.

    • Rentlar@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      86
      ·
      23 hours ago

      Steve Burke (of GN) described the absurdity pretty well, within the context of the currently uncertain Nvidia and OpenAI deal:

      Nvidia offered OpenAI $100B in investment, money that it didn’t have, as long as OpenAI gave that money back to Nvidia to lease GPUs that haven’t been made, to then put in data centres that haven’t been constructed, which will be powered by electricity that hasn’t come online, to then rent to users who haven’t subscribed, to provide them features that haven’t come to fruition.

      • teft@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        25
        ·
        22 hours ago

        And hope you’ve propped up the economy enough by the end of it that the government has to bail you out…sorry i meant provide a “backstop”.

      • ishartdoritos@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        10 hours ago

        Midjourney are the worse of the worse when it comes specifically training on stolen work from artists who dedicated their lives to it. They opened the floodgates to what we see now with mass theft of content by not getting sued into oblivion. Fuck them and their creepy little fuck face of a CEO.

        • kescusay@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          6 hours ago

          They’re also not providing a large language model, so they actually did have a path to profitability. It’s keeping LLMs updated and running that costs so much money that companies trying to do so are losing billions, and Midjourney doesn’t have that problem.

          It’s just that their path to profitability was built on plagiarism on an astonishing scale. You’re spot on, they should have been utterly destroyed right at the start.

          • ishartdoritos@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            4 hours ago

            Couldn’t agree more. They did really help greenlight “stealing everything is fair game” mentality. They came out before chatGPT gpt3 at the time LLMs were not hoovering everything including copyrighted content.

    • Yliaster@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      23 hours ago

      What about all the user data they sell to third parties? I’d be interested in knowing how that contributes to this

    • FaceDeer@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      22
      ·
      24 hours ago

      So what’s the problem? This looks self-correcting to me, if none of the AI companies are profitable then they’re going to go away. Short their stock and make a fortune.

        • FaceDeer@fedia.io
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          19
          ·
          24 hours ago

          Then invest in competitors, they’ve got a more flexible timeframe.

            • FaceDeer@fedia.io
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              34 minutes ago

              The companies that continue with human staff where others are replacing theirs, for example. Outsourcers providing those staff.

          • TechnoCat@piefed.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            25
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            23 hours ago

            Imagine your entire life is viewed through the lens of actions you can take in the stock market. What a sad life.

            • FaceDeer@fedia.io
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              14
              ·
              23 hours ago

              The original comment that this subthread descends from was about the profitability of AI companies.

      • GreenBeard@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        20
        ·
        23 hours ago

        The problem is the cost of that correction is going to fall on us. Or did we forget that the flavor of capitalism we live under is the “Privatize the profits, socialize the losses” kind. We’re not the ones in the casino, but we’re the ones who will lose our shirts when they lose.

      • XLE@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        16
        ·
        edit-2
        23 hours ago

        So what’s the problem?

        “What’s the problem” with the entire American economy being moored to a bunch of companies all acting as flaky as Enron and friends during the dot-com crash?

        Edit: just realized FaceDeer is obsessed with AI stuff, so he’s probably here just to troll with questions he already knows the answers to.

      • Attacker94@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        23 hours ago

        It’s only self correcting if the powers that be are losing money, which they aren’t because they are either liquidating important assets to pad their pockets or just using economic magic to make trillions appear out of no where. They’ll only feel it when their company or the economy collapses, and at that point they make off with their ill gotten gains

        • FaceDeer@fedia.io
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          12
          ·
          23 hours ago

          Where’s this infinite well of investment money coming from? “Economic magic” is pretty vague.

          • Attacker94@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            19 hours ago

            I wrote it intentionally vague because the reality is that we don’t know exactly how they are doing it, but we don’t need to to be able to see that there is a positive feedback loop between ai companies, cloud service providers and compute hardware manufacturers. Likely what they are doing is simply lying about their books and since the regulators have been bought already, or are simply incompotent, there is no one to say otherwise.

          • TechnoCat@piefed.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            23 hours ago

            Have you not heard of inflation? It is literally the creation of new monies that the government gives to banks to give loans.

            • Pup Biru@aussie.zone
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              11 hours ago

              that’s… not at all what inflation means… it is 1 of many causes of inflation

              and the government doesn’t “give” it to banks

              the reality is far more complex in both cases, even if sometimes the simplified version of things looks like that

      • thejml@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        24 hours ago

        In the mean time they’re soaking up all the RAM, SSD and silicon processing which makes basically everything with any of those cost a lot more (like the RAM I bought for $99, 4 yrs ago thats now $560). Not to mention the power requirements and costs being passed on to the consumers that don’t want it anyway.

        They’re also screwing up the environment in ways it won’t recover from.

        • FaceDeer@fedia.io
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          12
          ·
          23 hours ago

          Which is pouring money into the manufacturers of those things. If you’re convinced the AI companies are going to collapse then just wait a little and you’ll get all those things way cheaper than they were before.

          • thejml@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            8
            ·
            23 hours ago

            At the moment, most of that “money” is just stock in the other company. And the type of RAM and “GPU”'s being manufactured are not ones that normal consumers will use. They’re very specialized for AI en masse.

            Another thing around that is that the major manufacturers being leveraged for that gear have stated that they are not increasing production in the near future because of this. It seems they’re mostly in a “wait and see, it might just be a bubble” mode as scale up takes a lot of time and only pays off with continued demand over a long period of time.

            I’d love if it was going to be flooding the market with cheaper tech, but thats not been shown to be the case. And it’s really not worth the environmental impact in either case.

            • FaceDeer@fedia.io
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              9
              ·
              23 hours ago

              And the type of RAM and “GPU”'s being manufactured are not ones that normal consumers will use.

              They’re using the same foundries that would make those things. I’m not saying that there’ll be a flood of “used” equipment (though there would indeed be some of that too, other companies could set up data centers much more cheaply), I’m saying that the foundries will switch back to consumer products.

              The stock is worth a lot because it can be sold for a lot. If the manufacturers don’t think the AI companies will stick around they should be selling the stock they’re receiving from them. It’s money either way. What do you think they’re doing with that money?

        • FaceDeer@fedia.io
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          8
          ·
          23 hours ago

          That’s not how bankruptcy works. The investors don’t get their money back.

          • Yliaster@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            22 hours ago

            thanks for pointing that out.

            I’m not sure how this benefits the big corporations then. Surely they don’t have a deathwish? And aren’t stupid/incompetent enough to not see that? Else they’d not have gotten this big, right?

    • 123@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      19 hours ago

      Not in my experience. Once their clients budgets get cut by funding cuts due to reality and they notice it doesn’t do anything of benefit (on the clients side), they will be all “client first”.

  • XLE@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    61
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    24 hours ago

    If anybody leaves an AI company with a fat paycheck, promises to “be honest about the real problems,” and then proceeds to regurgitate things the AI company CEOs say: be suspicious.

    Exhibit A is Anthropic millionaire Mrinank Sharma, who only mentioned (future) peril from AI and AI-made bioweapons, two fictional scenarios on the short list that Anthropic officially endorses. It’s a list of things that please Anthropic investors.

    Real-world stuff like AI psychosis, poisoning people’s air, or generating CSAM doesn’t get a mention from him. There’s no profit in acknowledging those things, so he won’t.

    • aesthelete@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 hours ago

      Yep there is a deep attachment amongst AI boosters to certain doom and gloom scenarios that stem from their philosophical “think tanks” which use imaginary problems (e.g. “AGI ‘misalignment’ destroying the world through turning everything into paperclips”) to lobby and alter our laws to benefit their real bosses – anthropic, open ai, and friends.

    • melfie@lemy.lol
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      22 hours ago

      Maybe Claude Code learned this from its creators: I’ve noticed that when it says “the real issue is…”, that means it has no clue and is about barf out a bunch of slop that I’m going to have to revert.

  • bearboiblake@pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    79
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 day ago

    AI businesses are putting profits over sanity and safety.

    All businesses are. That’s what a business is. A legal entity that seeks to extract as much wealth from people as possible. They put profits before people as a matter of policy.

    Limited liability corporations should be outlawed.

    • iamthetot@piefed.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      24 hours ago

      That’s not what business is inherently; that’s what capitalism is.

      • fafferlicious@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        21 hours ago

        It’s not even strictly what capitalism is about. It’s some stupid bullshit interpretation that came out of the University of Chicago economics department.

        Seriously, go look at Adam Smiths wealth of nations. The only mention of the “invisible hand” is so different from what is taught in economics now

        … by directing that industry in such a manner as its produce may be of the greatest value, he intends only his own gain, and he is in this, as in many other cases, led by an invisible hand to promote an end which was no part of his intention.

        It’s not that we need no regulation. It’s just trying to say that if we set things up correctly, we don’t need to worry about people pursuing SOLELY their own personal gain. Because the market seeks out the “greatest value”, which is not just about money. It’s also the value to society as a whole.

        Instead, we got the fucking bullshit from Chicago saying that the only / best way of measuring value is by profit.

        • Reliant1087@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 hours ago

          It’s kind of funny how Adam Smith saw the need for moral philosophy to constrain greed in the economics of capitalism yet for most modern capitalists, capitalism is their moral philosophy 🤣

  • shirro@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    20 hours ago

    Every company does that. The difference is the AI companies will be broke soon and laying off all their staff so people are getting out before the collapse.

    • XLE@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      20 hours ago

      Exactly. And some of them are rats fleeing a sinking ship. Just look at Mrinank Sharma, who got paid a million bucks or so for a year at Anthropic, then ditched.