Stamets@lemmy.dbzer0.com to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 14 days agoInspirationallemmy.dbzer0.comimagemessage-square33linkfedilinkarrow-up1445arrow-down18
arrow-up1437arrow-down1imageInspirationallemmy.dbzer0.comStamets@lemmy.dbzer0.com to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 14 days agomessage-square33linkfedilink
minus-squarezxqwas@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up27·14 days agoIn a frictionless vaccuum 45° would be max range.
minus-squareSatansMaggotyCumFart@piefed.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up13arrow-down1·14 days agoYeah you actually want a bit less then that.
minus-squareOoops@feddit.orglinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up15·14 days agoUnless you use modern artillery. Then you want to aim even higher because at those ranges/heights it’s beneficial to reach less dense air layers quickly.
In a frictionless vaccuum 45° would be max range.
Yeah you actually want a bit less then that.
Unless you use modern artillery. Then you want to aim even higher because at those ranges/heights it’s beneficial to reach less dense air layers quickly.