Countries are growing uneasy about their dependence on U.S. technology firms.

  • melsaskca@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    8 hours ago

    Imagine that. Being indifferent to your customer base and forcing them into areas they don’t want to travel are two main behaviours that will destroy a business and bring it to ruin. Monopolies will always eventually have alternatives when their customers find out that the rain is just piss from above.

  • Dead_or_Alive@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    1 day ago

    Ramp it up!

    The worst crime you can commit under capitalism is not participating, not buying, not renting, etc. These tech companies are built on debt that is serviced by profits.

    Moving the needle down and impacting their income by even 5% will have a huge impact on a business’s bottom line and in turn a CEO’s income, bonuses and stock options etc.

    If you want to make Trump and his regime change then you have to hit the only people he will listen to… his fellow oligarchs.

      • Dead_or_Alive@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 hours ago

        I agree, the problem is you have to consume at some level you need food water clothes etc. and for poorer people 100% of their income goes to just buying the basics. You also don’t want to put other citizens out of jobs because of a boycott, that would get unpopular quickly.

        For this to work long term you need to get the top 10% or 20% of consumers to cut back on the extras. I.E. Amazon Prime, Netflix, Chat GPT subscriptions, hold off buying an iPhone or electronics, etc.

        If you did that and caused consumption to dip even 5% you would hurt the companies that the oligarchs run and in turn hurt Trump.

    • dejected_warp_core@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      23 hours ago

      As someone who is inside the IT industry, and has been for a while, I have some insight here. Yes, it’s stupidity alright, but a weird focused kind of stupidity like having a blind-spot. Money and ethics, IMO, are the only divisions that explain it.

      We like to think of tech as being this rebellious, counter-cultural place. And that tracks when you start talking about “information wants to be free” and “the internet circumvents censorship”, but also “market disruption” and “move fast and break things.” But there’s this problem where that rebellion is actually multiple groups moving in a similar direction. If you look at the decisions people make, there’s a clear tradeoff of ethics in line with freedom and liberty, for cold, hard cash. The people we’re talking about went for the money. It took me a long time to reconcile this, and I’m now comfortable concluding that the rebellious spirit here is less “damn the man” and more “fuck you, got mine.” Nevermind that it’s not sustainable and always ends in a death-spiral of everything they built.

      To put it another way, technohippies and conservatives agree about the broad strokes of personal liberty and rebelliousness right up until things like empathy all others get involved. Once you surrender those kinds of ethics, or figure out that having few/none is seen as an asset, bigger paychecks are on offer; its too good to pass up for some folks. It should come as no surprise that aligning one’s self with authoritarianism and even fascism is a small step from there.

      And my personal experience - take with salt - there’s also a lot of people in security that are just VERY pessimistic, if not outright fearful, of their fellow man. A lot of them vote to the right, despite depending on an industry mostly fueled by left-thinking labor. They’re highly skilled, competent, and intelligent people in every other way. Once again, I think the fat paycheck smooths a lot of this over.

  • arc99@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    1 day ago

    Not everywhere can wean itself off, but the “big three” cloud compute companies arent the only shows in town. And of course there is a multitude of free and open source replacements for commercial software with companies willing to provide support.

  • bestelbus22@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    1 day ago

    It’s all so unnecessary. But at least we finally do something about digital sovereignty in the EU.

  • AlexLost@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    1 day ago

    They had already gone off the deep end. They’ve been enshittifying everything they can get their hands on and monetizing the slightest edge they can to everything as well. Tech bros are just the pharma bro multiplied. People that bring no value to the world make things that they have no knowledge about or input on behind pay walls because they can. It’s for the shareholders brah! Rid the world of nepo CEOs and we’ll all be in a better place. Also “economics” belongs with the other junk science like chiropractors. Some of them are great and some of the science is needed. Most of it is just junk that only makes sense to them and their schemes.

    • Sunflier@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 day ago

      Oh Blockbuster, who art in heaven

      Hallowed be thy memory

      Thy storefront come

      Thy movies return

      On Earth as it is in Heaven

      Give us this day our daily movie rentals

      And forgive us our shortsightedness

      As we forgive those who exploit us for money

      And lead us not into micro-transactions

      But deliver us from enshittification

      For thine is the Weekend

      The Power and the Vibes

      Forever and ever

      Amen

  • eagerbargain3@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    ·
    1 day ago

    I’m selfhosting most of my stuff now and did closed 500 accounts, still 960 to review. It take times but I always while closing enter a comment like “lost confidence in USA for the next 50 years thanks to Trump” BTW most services don’t let you delete your account, in this case I empty all my personal data, upload blank images for profile, anonymize field, move email to temp mailbox and delete my password.

    I did some architecture and implementation to Azure for a big client, now moved to pure AKS with only OSS software, nest step for them is to quit US cloud, a lot easier if you use pure kubernetes.

    I think it is good that we reduce our reliance on US stacks, but not at the cost of using Chinese softwares.

    Deleting Reddit, instagram, facebook was really the easiest and most satisfying of all.

    I plan to organize meetup on sovereignty, privacy and self hosting soon too 😇

      • eagerbargain3@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        23 hours ago

        it is easy to have 1500+ passwords, I’m online since 1996 :-) and use a password manager like keepass, some sites died, others are still online, i have multiple mailbox, twitter, facebook. it goes up really fast!

        not counting also all SSO with google, apple, and now my own pocketid selfhosted domain :-)

        I will have to remove also those 50+ google authentificator TOTP and replace them with passkeys…

        BTW, it is recommended to use single password per service sinces more than 20 years now, so without a password manager it is impossible to create new accounts. i started in firefox, then chrome password manager, then keepassX …

        • drath@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          24 hours ago

          This is… completely normal amount of accounts? I am at 1083 saved in my password manager. Admittedly it’s a bit inflated with things like crypto wallets and few dozen passwords for 192.168.1.1 for every router I ever saw. But then, I also been on account deletion spree for a year now and been avoiding making new accounts if at all possible, otherwise I’d easily be over 1500

        • ipkpjersi@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 day ago

          My question is how does someone even know the number of accounts they have lmao

          Like, over the past 2+ decades I’ve been using the Internet, I can’t even give an estimate of how many accounts I have.

      • JohnEdwa@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 day ago

        I have over 200 logins overall, but most of them are to forums that have been dead for a decade.

        The internet used to be quite a different place back in the day, people had separated communities and everything wasn’t just on a handful of massive platforms.

    • ipkpjersi@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 day ago

      I’d always get paranoid that they’d revert the changing your details like reddit did when they undeleted mass-deleted comments before.

  • Bytemeister@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    1 day ago

    I’d say that individual companies need to make contingency plans for when the US puts up their own great firewall (assuming they haven’t already, since I’m in the US).

    I think it would be prudent for nations that have Google/Amazon/Microsoft datacenters in them to create legislation that allows them to nationalize or detach those services from the US. I have no doubt that we will eventually have our own policy that gives us the privilege to snoop on foreign data in foreign datacenters that are running US owned hardware.

    • zbyte64@awful.systems
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 day ago

      For this to be practical you need to audit and control the code the runs in the data center. I think that was a hangup with some Chinese based services that offered to host in the EU.

  • canofcam@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    1 day ago

    As a QA, I raised the very real risk that should tensions with America escalate, they could effectively cut us off and our business would be kaputt.

    What happens if AWS goes down? We use Google. What happens if both go down (or cut us off)? We’re fucked.

    The answer to me raising the risk was a, “Haha, yeah, true, we’d be in big trouble…” but there’s no actual appetite to do anything about it. We’re so tied up in AWS that I can’t imagine there ever will be.

    • JohnEdwa@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 day ago

      You’d think the few global AWS and Cloudflare outages would have worked as a warning, but most people just went from “nah it couldn’t ever happen” to “well, it did happen, but surely it wouldn’t ever last all too long”.

    • kaljakoripallomaha@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 day ago

      That’s the thing, we’re all so tightly involved in those few platforms it’s near impossible to correct the situation in the short term.

      In our company we’re also documenting the risks related to US services and it’s pretty bleak. And even if we magically untangled ourselves from all that, we’d still be screwed when all the suppliers, the local infrastructure and literally everything is still on top of those. Honestly I’m not even sure if we’d get through the doors or have electricity in the whole cities we operate in if all went out at once.

      The best we can do in short term is to not make it worse and choose wiser with new projects, migrate everything that can be done cheaply and hope for the best until we can get everything lifted off US governed services. Even with the risk recognised, it still doesn’t warrant that magnitude of investment. So we at least plan and document everything as well as we can.

  • Darkmoon_AU@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    60
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    I’m playing my part… Undoing a large part of a SaaS platform I’ve been building, to detangle it from AWS and reimplement for Scaleway/UpCloud. This is a significant practical setback for me, but I can no longer live with myself giving dollars to both Bezos AND a fascist regime every month. Not to mention the direct risk of the US fucking with my business down the track for any old batshit reason. Account closed.

  • Jo Miran@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    128
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    2 days ago

    The entire point of the Internet’s infrastructure design was for it to be highly distributed. At some point, companies and governments decided to cramntheir entire critical IT infrastructure into monolithic services. In this case it was the US, but it could have been anyone anywhere. No matter who, it was a bad practice and everyone is now realizing why.

    This isn’t a “US bad” problem. This is a “don’t be stupid, stupid” issue.

      • Jo Miran@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        20
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        My point is that had companies and governments no opted to put all their eggs in one basket, it wouldn’t have mattered as much whether the US morphed into a fascist hellscape or not.

    • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      26
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      The entire point of the Internet’s infrastructure design was for it to be highly distributed.

      The textbook explainer for the existence of the internet was (at least) two fold:

      • Provide a high speed communication between research universities for conveying large amounts of digital data

      • Devise a system of redundant communication such that any major node going offline would not cripple the international data infrastructure (specifically with an eye towards major natural disasters or nuclear wars).

      But the evolution of the system, from a boutique international data exchange for government enterprises to a business-heavy commercial data system to a retail facing SaaS model degraded both original goals.

      Data is no longer supposed to be public and freely traded. It is jealously guarded as a commodity controlled by a handful of privatized tech giants. And due to the continuous, voracious digital harvesting performed by these tech giants, more and more of the information needs to be siloed, encrypted, and otherwise shielded. This clogs the vast redundant network with overlarge choke-points designed to filter out unwanted traffic and shield the identity/data of its users.

      This isn’t a “US bad” problem. This is a “don’t be stupid, stupid” issue.

      The stupidity is a directly result of how the US private sector repurposed tools layout out by the international public sector. Unregulated solicitations and chronic system intrusions by malicious actors aimed at a naive retail user base, combined with the gluttonous privatization of research data, has inverted the core function of the network.

      And because of the Tragedy of the Commons, there is no single actor who can fix the problem through their own virtue. You can’t unfuck this chicken with a Meshnet or through voluntary individualistic commitments to ideological principles unbound from the central rules of network communication.

      You need the heavy hand of national scale regulators and industry scale redevelopment to re-engineer how the root layers of the internet function if you want to get back to its original design.

      Or… if we’re moving in the direction it seems that we’re moving… we’re going to end up with a wholly proprietary loose confederation of Walled Gardens that look more and more like the Anarcho-Capitalist model of civil government (ie, The Network State).

      • Jo Miran@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        2 days ago

        You can’t unfuck this chicken.

        100% I am definitely not offering an easy fix, and I hope my comment didn’t read that way. This chicken is…

    • Jason2357@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      2 days ago

      The Internet is still distributed, it’s the ownership (and thus also the command and control) that is super inbred. Cloudflare, Google, Aws, they all have hardware distributed in every city.

    • Earthman_Jim@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      2 days ago

      The internet should have been nationalized under the purview of national postal services globally with private options through telecoms.

      Maybe it’s not too late?

        • Earthman_Jim@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 day ago

          This administration may not exist without the rampant political manipulation that happened online by “private” companies.

    • Broken@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      2 days ago

      Correct. And everyone needs to remember the actual problem, not the symptom. Its like leaving one social media platform for another then when it too goes to crap complaining. Oh how can this happen again!?

    • gandalf_der_12te@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 day ago

      to be honest, it might have a significant impact. the US tech today serves a global market, but if that market gets reduced to just the US, that is probably a significant cut.

  • lechekaflan@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    35
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    Obviously because once that country collapses or becomes a pariah state and starts fooling with the data for nefarious purposes, all goes almost anything the rest of the world relies on, including website hosting services. So, yeah, decentralization is necessary.