Also, a year or two ago, I installed Windows XP (the one from 2001) on a relatively modern computer with an SSD. (The hardware was supported, as it wasn’t too modern.) I expected the whole thing to be like 5 minutes compared to an hour it was back then. Turned out, it took about an hour! Why? I couldn’t get it, Ubuntu or Fedora took like 5 mins for that very PC with an SSD.

The funny thing, installing Arch Linux to a relatively old computer, if you did the install pretty often, to the point of knowing what to do, the installation takes like a minute or two, completely depending on the internet speed.

Technically, other distros with modern SSDs and powerful processors, are in the same league. As there’s little difference in what they do upon installing. It’s really cool! I stopped bothering backing up some important system data beyond some configs and the list of installed apps, purely because reinstalling the whole thing is just non-issue, a couple of minutes.

And I’d say that was an interesting read, as someone who’s long in the game, so I cannot install the thing for the first time again. I hope your post would inspire someone else to try waters too.

I second this. When I came to the world of Linux almost 20 years ago, it was different. Games were mostly non-existent, interfaces were mostly super ugly (but tolerable), and things did not work quite often. To solve these issues, I developed a pretty solid base of knowledge that helps me in my day to day work, and life too. I just understand things much better, I guess. All that thanks to Linux. These days Linux, I’d say it just works. I run Fedora at home, and apart from some inconveniences, it was rock solid and very easy. A cherry on top, our shared home computer is mostly HTPC serving media to the huge screen, running Kodi on top of Gnome. And it has no keyboard attached! Which is fine, Gnome is quite manageable with just a mouse. I bet it would manageable the other way around, with just a keyboard.

What do you mean by the easiest way? For me, that’s pretty simple: backups. In general, it’s a nice idea to have your /home separated (partition or disk), but in reality, I don’t bother. I just do backups. Considering things are mostly in the cloud (e.g. browser bookmarks), the backups are usually just the files, rarely some configs. That’s why I don’t bother separating home even for myself. Most times reinstalling something is not an issue. Actually, rather teaching someone using the interface is more of a problem.

That’s why I wanted to ask why did you choose Mint for your task? I’m trying to migrate one place to Linux off Windows, all they do is basically browser and some printing (I checked, their printer works out of the box with Linux). I settled with Fedora atomic desktop. First I wanted Kinoite, as KDE is very similar to Windows, visually. But I gave it some thought and realised it’s too complicated for a basic use case, and Gnome is just very good and simple, and perhaps it would be just not too difficult to have them learned the new interface. It’s not much after all: the top left corner, plus top right corner to power off the machine. I expect them to get familiar in no time, but I’ll see how it goes over time, as I have just installed the whole thing very recently and haven’t migrated them fully yet. (I have to transfer their files to the new SSD I bought them, before giving them the new system.)

I thought of Mint myself, but I don’t like Ubuntu, never liked Mint, and I thought I’d prefer something more modern. I just have very positive, mostly positive, experience with having Fedora at home, it was mostly great for years, with some occasional inconveniences. But since I’m pretty experienced with Linux, most things could be fixed within minutes. I’m yet to discover how it would work in the wild.

The author is Russian. That’s their culture after all.