Hilarious… I guess this pushes back the inevitable bubble collapse (probably until just after they do go public)

Thanks!

What interface are you using that has user tagging on .world?

Which also says that mn is common…

No? https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/mn

I think if you read this as trying to communicate to a Republican audience, it’s much less LAMF… I don’t think she’s trying to complain, I think she’s trying to shift the right… Seems like a good outcome to me.

Also, republicans are not solely responsible for America’s insane car dependency, that shit has been building for a century. No one born in the last 50 years voted for this…

She’s literally arguing for bike lanes?

Good analysis.

I would say that (as a non-American lefty), when I hear “freedom” in an American context, I hear “individualism”, and since that’s usually more focussed on “freedom to …” rather than “freedom from …”, then it isassociated with privilege, especially when uttered by middle class people

There’s other photos of her that look pretty similar

When you’re losing your biggest fans (e.g. the author), that’s a strong signal…

Is it not a problem to have part of your fibula missing? Can you operate without it?

Are they just saying that to avoid retribution?

I mean… People might think it’s empty trash. That’s almost clever

GenAI replaces a lot of thinking. It is not on the same scale as those other tools. With an LLM, I can easily submit big chunk of code that does a thing, without understanding anything about how or why it does it. That’s not possible with just an IDE. Writing is a form of thinking that gives a much deeper unserstanding than reading and you dont get that with an LLM. That thought-bypass can rapidly become a maintainability issue, and increases the risk of major bugs going undetected.

Enjoying these jabs. It’s like if Gavin Newsom was capable of subtlety. I imagine it’s nettling trump but he might be struggling to understand why…

JFC. The FSB was specifically set up to prevent future GFC-style market collapses. Where is their statement about circular investment and insane leverage rates for a technology that is literally burning money and driving the climate risk that they have a whole taskforce about?

What wrong things?

Why would you not want to disclose though? Is it because of shame? Because you are unable to defend your choice? If it’s “just a tool”, is that not enough to defend your choice?

To be clear: the alternative policy we’re talking about isn’t “LLMs are bad, don’t use them”, it’s “Let us know when you are using LLMs”

Yes… That was also disappointing :(

because a simple disclaimer doesn’t distinguish between the work done,

So just declare how you used the tool?

and also encourages people to point out to AI as a scapegoat for their mistakes.

Nonsense. Doing so is clearly abdicating the responsibility that you’re saying people need to have, and basically admitting you’re a bad developer.