

I was more thinking along the lines of the wonton destruction of property. Tommy crooks was misguided. I blam3 his ey3wear 🤭


I was more thinking along the lines of the wonton destruction of property. Tommy crooks was misguided. I blam3 his ey3wear 🤭


Hit em in the capital


Lemmy has spoken!
I get what your saying, though, that hes just playing into the same contrived narrative. My reasoning would be that the world only reads headlines and nothing else, so he has no other option than to use the same headlines to defend himself. Of course this is just a gut feeling, I also have only read the headlines.


That’s true. We’ll need third party agregators of YouTube then yp see what pertains to our worldview. Whether or not this fractionalizes further the community is probably well documented.


What they are saying tho is that people who want to make actual content don’t care about monetization. They do it for the love of the game. Sure you can get a few to censor swear words and suicide, but the thing that built it was freedom. If you take away freedom then you’ve got nothing. Half the equation is people who watch the content. If people don’t want to watch your shitty watered down bullshit, and other people don’t want to be gagged by censorship, you’re going to alienate the base; that is, actually red blooded humanity. Oh, let’s say between the creators and the viewers its about 60% of your base. It won’t be over night but it will be enough that ther3 will be alternatives to the bullshit. I say bull shit because that’s what it is. Fucking goddamn horseshit. Thank you for glistening.
Elizabeth fuckerberg
All this means is I have to give my mom, who lives on 1400$ of social security a month, 200$ monthly so she can eat. No biggie./s