Dunning Kruger
- 0 Posts
- 4 Comments
Dunning Kruger@lemmy.worldto
World News@lemmy.world•Nestlé knew of tainted baby formula in NovemberEnglish
3·2 months agodeleted by creator
Dunning Kruger@lemmy.worldto
You Should Know@lemmy.world•YSK in the U.S., you can buy produce directly from black farmers and they will ship it to you. It can cost less than your supermarket and will piss off people in power.
0·1 year agoSure, it can seem on the surface like wanting to support people of a particular race is in itself a kind of racism, or at least a situation that emphasizes unfair distinctions.
Unfortunately, race does still matter in America, even if we personally disagree with it or want to ignore it. The health and economic research data make it very clear that people of color in America, especially black people, experience harder lives in almost every category. This is due to both recurring experiences of present-day prejudice and discrimination, as well the inter-generational impacts of wealth inequality and psychological trauma.
You might already know about this, but redlining is one example of the way that patterns of discrimination can creates a systemic effect, which, in turn, can impact the physical and financial effects on a family across time. These kinds of systemic effects can then make it harder for current generations of these families to recover and live safe lives today though, we personally might celebrate that the policy doesn’t exist anymore, and even though we personally might say that we don’t support people acting like that anymore.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Redlining
No one really has to do anything, but some people might choose to support groups of people or organizations who they think might have experienced similar kinds of hardships in their families, and might be glad to have a way to try to do something different with their money than give it to another multinational corporation every time.

It sounds like the assertions here are:
“Mass surveillance is not lawful and the government thus agreed not to do that.” Which is to say- the government will not do something if it is illegal.
The greater good of the work that the Department of Defense needs to do may justify infringement of some individual liberties.
The Department of Defense is run by lawful actors who can be trusted to make lawful decisions based on their own discretion.
Is this right?