Where are you getting the “deep-fake” from? The article doesn’t mention that. All the footage is real, it was just cut to take his words out of context.

No AI was involved here, did you read the article? The video was just edited to reorder what he said, changing the context.

Do you have any source on this? I have never seen a similar article about phones sending a 3D map of your home to the manufacturer.

Any primary school math textbook will do as a source and tell you not all rectangles are squares, even if a square is a rectangle.

I’m not sure what your point is. There are many people that like AI but don’t like Copilot. So a statistic of people liking AI is not equivalent to a statistic of people liking Copilot. That’s like saying people love my baking because people like baking in general, even though I didn’t ask anyone about my baking in particular.

There is a vast difference between people using/liking AI and people using/liking Copilot.

Also suggesting a gaming distribution to someone that gave no indication plays video games at all…

The marketing is more for the submersible camera that survived, just like it was designed to do, the SD card was just inside the camera and no water even touched it. I don’t think the SD card should be getting any credit.

Of the coco tree

So what? Them driving is not relevant to this at all. The idea is that the cars they sell become illegal.

Yes, and then they ban that developer and their apps. It doesn’t matter you can install apps outside of the Play Store, if Google still controls which apps you are allowed to install.