I remember army officers and cia folks, specifically. It wouldn’t surprise me that israel got caught as well.

Oh, damn! Thanks for reminding me to add that extension since I reinstalled my browser.

Shot in the back while on his stomach, what a hero that cop was. Better late than never. Still, it seems like there is a lot of wishy washy about this. Previous das declining to charge, an indictment reached but still the da is going to “review” the case and “decide” whether to prosecute?

My favorite citric acid cycle fact is that cancer cells often just stop doing it. Something in the pentose shunt pathway provides a critical metabolite, because just about every cancer mass you’ll find is busy with ‘not’ the citric acid cycle and is kicking out those products. My cancer biology professor didn’t really have a good answer as to why (it wasn’t his specialty, he just got told to teach it, lol).

For me, that’s the case with basically every animal, buuuuuuuuut… That’s what gloves and secure containers are for in lab work. I am going to bet they never had those roaches ‘free’ at any time. Having them in one secure container that is then attached to another and a panel between them removed would work fine with me.

I’ve never read through the wikipedia article, and wanted to see if it mentioned my favorite fact: cockroaches perform better when observed by other cockroaches. IT DID! So cool!

…

and then it said the classical psychology mood killer: no evidence found when the experiment was replicated.

expect

That’s an odd way to spell hope, but you do you. If we didn’t have violent pushback when vans of plain clothes cops were shooting people when the entire reason for protests was a cop killing someone, we’re not going to get violent pushback now.

I’ve heard the blue light thing before, but is it really that much of a thing? When we look for veins, I don’t even see color anymore. It’s tourniquet, squeeze, fondle your armpit, stab you.

While I’m sure that the current dipshits at the top want it to be a crime in and of itself, in most places it will only be a escalation of another crime, like you burning your neighbor’s clothes, but if you burn their flag it’s a higher charge. I know a few places still have the flag burning on the books specifically for that. It’s just like other property destruction charges, where they don’t specifically spell out that you can’t be charged for destroying your own property.

As others have pointed out, the sheriff is an elected position. All you have to do is move in the right circles, and out in the boonies those circles are the local church(es) and republican party.

Hah, got it. I know of at least two capitol hills I’ve been to in other major cities, so I wasn’t sure.

Right, but, it seems like, according to this picture and a lot of the folks commenting, that if you meet a furry you will know, probably by dint of them telling you.

I mean, it sounds right. It’s been so long that I’ve forgotten.

Ah, nice city. I’ve been there a few times, but somehow I’ve never bumped into a furry. I always spent more times in the wilds nearby though, so maybe that does the trick.

Wasn’t that 1500 whatever-the-unit-was? Below 1000 whatever-the-unit-was was the fingerprint bands, 3400ish whatever-the-unit-was was the O-H bonds, 3100ish whatever-the-unit-was was N-H bonds, 2900ish whatever-the-unit-was was the triple-to-C-H bonds, etc.

Ugh. The lab portion for that was so tedious. We would have to sketch the expected resonance patterns by hand for a bunch of different molecules. I loved the simplicity of the hydrogen bond nuclear resonance imaging so much more.

Which capitol hill, lmao?

Everyone here is assuming they’re trying to outlaw this. It is already outlawed. They’re looking to overturn it.

WHO is trying to overturn it? Did YOU read the article?

Remember that the supreme court often picks up a case after a back and forth, and that the previous ‘last stop’ of the case helps determine what’s going on. The previous court had voided the law, and now dump and co. are trying to revive the case. So if the supreme court was fine with ‘legalizing it’ they could have done so by dint of letting the lower court’s ruling lie. Maybe, just maybe, the supreme court is doing what it is supposed to do when lower courts disagree with each other on rulings, but let’s be honest, do you think this supreme court cares about anything but helping the conservative pushes? If it gets more laws that can be used against non-wasps, they’ll slap down some ai generated bullshit faster than thomas can get in an rv.

the court was trying to do the bad thing without even reading the article

I mean, they likely are. Sort of. Remember that the supreme court often picks up a case after a back and forth, and that the previous ‘last stop’ of the case helps determine what’s going on. The previous court had voided the law, and now dump and co. are trying to revive the case. So if the supreme court was fine with overturning the law they could have done so by dint of letting the lower court’s ruling lie.

The Supreme Court is considering legalizing it

Sort of. Remember that the supreme court often picks up a case after a back and forth, and that the previous ‘last stop’ of the case helps determine what’s going on. The previous court had voided the law, and now dump and co. are trying to revive the case. So if the supreme court was fine with ‘legalizing it’ they could have done so by dint of letting the lower court’s ruling lie.

Logically, yes, but this court doesn’t need logic where it is going…