bright

I’m not nearly expert enough to know, try asking OP in a way that he’ll get a notification of your comment

In the Organic Maps app just tap the button with 3 lines (≡) in the lower right corner, then tap “add place”. To update info on a thing that already exists just tap on that thing and then tap “edit place” at the bottom of the page.

I think the TLDR of the entire post is this:

• anyone can edit the map, and it can be fun to do.

• So open the app and see if anything is missing or wrong, and add your info to anything that feels good to do

I don’t know if that’s true, especially in comparison to ai. I think a competent random human would do research before taking charge of a coffee shop and be in reasonably good shape from day one. For sure some mistakes would be made, but i think generally the operation would run ok.

But all of that misses the key difference - a human doing this wouldn’t be a random person, they would usually have relevant past experience, like previously being an assistant manager at a coffee shop. So they would manage the shop way better than this ai did.

Maybe if they create an ai that has been specially designed to manage a business then it might perform as well or better than a human, possibly. But just throwing a standard ai in the role is gonna work much less well than a human.

I can’t find any other sources for that and i have no idea how reliable that German source is. Can anyone verify?

EDIT

I found a couple of other sources that say the same thing. I don’t recognize any of them, but enough are saying it that it’s believable. (For a claim of more importance i would need stronger sources, but for a fun fact it’s good enough)

Does your greenhouse have sides, a top, and at least 1 door? Then the space inside there is indoors.

Like, names of presidents? Dude.

.one

That already exists

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/.one_(domain)

Which park?

Sure, it’s not so hard to do when it’s on someone ELSE’S continent.

I assume you meant “dominate”

Damn their kidneys must be monsters to process that much water every time they eat a little fishy

EDIT:

Actually it turns out they spit out all the water before swallowing. Makes much more sense

Their throat pouch can hold over 3 gallons (13 liters) of water, but they drain the water before swallowing their prey.

https://earthsky.org/earth/pelicans-are-the-masters-of-air-land-and-water/

Aside from like not having a country name or formal procedures, I think you’re probably mostly wrong actually.

Your confused about what I’m saying. The ARRAY OF RADAR STATIONS is emitters. I’m saying THE ATTACKERS AGAINST the array of radar stations only need to be passive detectors.

That’s the topic of the thread your replying in. Quote:

you could theoretically make a moderately large distributed array sprinkled over a few square kilometers

Your information about passive radar detection is not up to date. There are tons of passive detection of radar systems that by design do zero emission. The radar array stations will need to emit in order to function, but the enemy can find those radar emitters without emitting any energy of their own

https://daronmont.com.au/products/passive-radar

I’m not understanding. Let’s say army A has a radar array of 500 relatively cheap radar stations. They clump them all into a 1 square km area. So now army Z drives some howitzers nearby (which aren’t detectable by ground based radar), waits till a radar station turns on, the passively locates the radar base station, and shoots a cheap shell at it which destroys it.

But if you say army A has the level of military equipment that can locate and destroy howitzers up to 30 km away in all directions, then what benefit does an array of concentrated radar stations provide?

Locating radar emissions is a passive process, it doesn’t reveal your own location. That’s why i said the radar array would have to have very strong defenses extending out 30 km in all 360 degree directions from each individual radar station. And if a group has that strong a level of military equipment already then i don’t see why they would need this huge redundant array of radar stations all concentrated in a small area.

Locating the radar base station? No that’s the easiest part. Radar is like turning on a Hollywood style searchlight pointing up into the sky. The instant you turn it on its extremely obvious where the radar searchlight is coming from

Unless I’m missing something in your plan i don’t think that would work well. If these radar stations aren’t surrounded by very serious defensive systems for hundreds of miles in every direction, then they’ll simply be blown up by dumb howitzer shells that only cost around 2000 dollars.

Howitzers are cheap, relatively long range, mobile, and accurate enough. If you don’t have strong enough defenses to prevent the howitzers from moving into range, then they’ll just blow up all your radar stations with cheap shells.