

You are actually doing both. But given your use of ‘SJW’, I’m just going to assume you’re a terrible person and block you. If you are not, perhaps work a little harder to separate yourself from them?


You are actually doing both. But given your use of ‘SJW’, I’m just going to assume you’re a terrible person and block you. If you are not, perhaps work a little harder to separate yourself from them?


It is super easy to use a different word and not be a bigot. Just saying.


Sooo…
-Trans athletes form their own leagues. -Other athletes start competing because they go where the competition is and/or ideological reasons. -Olympics slowly become irrelevant.
Good job, Olympics.
I will remind everyone that as of 2023, about 3% of 18-24 yr olds identified as transgender. That’s a lot of people, and that percentage is only going to go up.


Real libertarians would just be anarcho-communists since you really need some sort of community to cover the gaps in your abilities.
There’s a reason ancient farming communities almost universally shared food communally. One bad harvest and you’re dead.


No ableism please.


I was a pescatarian for all of like two months. I was in the, ‘Ok, it’s still bad for the environment, but at least fish are dumber so it’s more ethical’ phase.
It’s useful as a transitory phase into vegetarianism.


Cool pic OP. Love that sort of ‘bizaree slice of life’.
If we ripped the car sewers out of our streets we could probably have enough green space that it would just, ya know, soak in. But go ahead and spend public money on technogimmicks I guess.
EDIT: So after reading the bill, I can see the following problem:
It limits any level of government from restricting the private use of AI tech unless it meets a relatively high bar of legality and specificity. Remember that private use refers to both personal and business use. This means that e.g. a township could NOT decide to ban datacenters due to environmental concerns, water use, etc. They would need to prove a specific datacenter was ‘creating common law nuisances’ AND that they had exhausted other legal options before they could create any legal restrictions on that specific datacenter (let alone a blanket restriction). The law technically allows for other ‘compelling government interests’, but fails to list them… meaning it could be challenged in court and would be completely open to a judge’s decision. Basically this creates a legal environment where datacenters have a right to operate and any attempt to regulate them would be fraught with the risk of expensive court cases.
Pro-business legislation dressed up as personal rights. Never change, Montana.