• 0 Posts
  • 14 Comments
Joined 11 days ago
cake
Cake day: July 24th, 2026

help-circle








  • There’s some kind of threshold of # of subscriptions and $ of subscription people are willing to be tolerant of.

    Like most people were ok with Netflix/Prime when they were the only two in town and it cost like $20-$25 for both.

    Now there’s how many different streaming services? You don’t even have an easy way to know which provider has what anymore either.

    Microsoft currently sells 4 different passes… and I have no idea whatsoever which gives me what… And the prices range from $14 to $25 CAD, which is the upper limit of what people want to pay in total subscription cost alone.

    People get games with Netflix and Prime on top of their existing subscription and I’m sure most people don’t play or even know about them. lol


  • I’m actually really surprised this didn’t work. They had acquired such a large amount of quality studios, IPs and a huge back catalogue. They had enough money to keep the subscription low indefinitely. Getting added to the Game Pass was a huge deal for indie devs at one point, but I think those who did were disapointed with returns.

    Granted the article says they dropped 300 million on Jedi Survivor and Suicide Squad… which gets to the point of how unsustainable subscription models are. It’s like a smaller version of the Ai market. Just like how you can’t break even on 300 million selling a $10 a month subscription, you can’t break even on $30 billion investments with the same $10 subscription.

    Still, how could you possibly mess this up. lol



  • It’s more of a symbolic thing. FreeBSD has removed the vast majority of gpl code over the last decades. I think this specific removal was just a last lingering overlap that was difficult to replace.

    Is it bad? It’s subjective. The project goals were always to be permissive. There was just historical borrowing from other open source projects.

    I think both approaches are valid. GPL has fostered a greater number of maintainers and volunteer participants. That’s definitely its shown strength but you can also attribute fragmentation to this. Whereas BSD has created much more focused and targeted distributions. I guess that’s indirectly due to the license and more the smaller group of active contributors.

    It’s really difficult to rival FreeBSD at certain specific usecases. I wouldn’t use anything else for a NAS or a router.

    It’s a very lopsided distro, bad gpu and wifi support. Limited application support. Really not ideal for a desktop, nor is it really meant to be used that way.


  • Exactly, it’s a defining feature of the project. They don’t care how you use the code as long as you use it. It’s just a different philosophy.

    BSDs are just doing their own thing and whether they benefit or not from others using their work is not really a concern.

    Take OpenSSH, it’s used by virtually every operating system and just exists to be used. It’s a great contribution to software even if OpenBSD is a tiny marginal thing used by only those that need it. They are cool with that.