I looked a few things up… and you aren’t wrong. It relies on primary sources way too much.

The first thing I noticed about grokipedia is that it doesn’t do a good job at qualifying the strength of sources.

I’m glad the Democratic lawmakers are not pulling a Fetterman. If the Democratic lawmakers always vote Republican, why even vote for them in the first place?

I feel like this is backfiring for Republicans. No one sees them as honest anymore.

I mean, it feels like Repubilicans have gone too far on this one. It’s just becoming noise. No one believes the Republicans anymore. Someone neutral could ask, “If you want the Democrats to vote for it, what did you do to get their vote?” And the response would be, “Nothing.”

Exactly, the last democrat to capitulate to republicans without getting anything in return was John Fetterman, and it’s not like he didn’t get his reputation damaged for doing so.

They are already vilified by Republicans, so it isn’t like they have anything to lose. If the Democrats cave, they will just be vilified by Democratic voters, too.

What is the Republicans end game here? Democrats aren’t going to vote for his bill without getting anything in return. Why would anyone think otherwise.

I know a lot of other social medias censor this idea, but throughout history, a lot of human rights only came about when people rose up to defend it.