Going to circle back around on uncomputible in “our” version of reality. I mean it’s kind of lazy in its way but it seems like the possibility that the “real” universe is a fundamentally different kind of place throws out most if not all methods for “proving” it’s not. I’m not even a fan of the matrix theory but still, to acknowledge it.

This doesn’t really address the idea that our simulation is a simplified version of the “real” universe though does it?

Tend to agree, security is always the goal but if someone is in my house hacking my vacuum, I have bigger issues. The no-notice remote kill is the bigger issue to me.

Nice, thanks!

I feel like we aren’t seeing the same thing. On mobile, the CBC.CA page does not show any pictures of the 23 brands. At the very end they have quotes for 2 brands by name but not associated with the actual levels found in the study and those two brands quoted are the only direct name mentions. Top comment even implies I’m right by linking “the actual information”.

I hate this type of article because they use the numbers from the singular worst finding and then refuse to name names.