Thankfully in America we have

Point: potential security risks identified while extremely expensive!

Honestly that can apply to a majority of cities in America.

So it’s okay to kill civilians. Got it!

Which gets back to people being okay with them (civilians) getting killed and not at all leopards eating face worthy.

There’s a few including redacted cheering it.(who also said I and others should be fed into the fire to stop putin)

Example

https://lemmy.world/comment/23377020

Even you are just saying it’s okay because their leader stated it.

when the Putin sends you

Edit Love when users refuse to acknowledge what they say

You’re saying all the Russians should be killed to prevent others from being killed, therefore it’s okay for Ukraine to hit an oil refinery which is gong to kill civilians.

Even added I should be included in being killed by pointing that out.

How insulting me for that…

So yes the argument is kill them all to hurt putin. Thank you for confirming!

For not cheering civilians getting killed???

Ukraine is not bombing civilians

While not directly hitting them doing a lot more to hurt them than it’ll hurt putin

Most would consider causing a chemical disaster harming civilians. I get Ukraine is trying to take out resources but let’s not frame this as good for anyone

https://blog.nwf.org/2025/12/when-the-smoke-clears-the-health-and-environmental-toll-of-refinery-explosions/

Because a large amount of people don’t see Russians as civilians 😭.

But honestly how does anyone cheer for causing chemical disasters in any city

And because they’re just doing land grabs

Hard to say thats it if just having 2TB uploaded is enough to be considered in the top.

Especially if they’ve already started ignoring other cloud files in people’s backups

Or 3 massive liability/ lawsuit /investigation about to be announced.

Unfortunately just a figurehead and their actual leader is all about staying on usa good side

https://thehill.com/policy/international/5798457-germany-frank-walter-steinmeier-us-iran-conflict-breach-international-law/

The German president holds a largely ceremonial role that allows more freedom for criticism compared with other politicians in the nation. German Chancellor Friedrich Merz has also raised concerns about the war but emphasized maintaining relations with the U.S.

Merz is a member of the conservative Christian Democratic Union of Germany.

But Steinmeier, a member of the center-left Social Democratic Party, called the war a “politically disastrous mistake” that had irrevocably harmed transatlantic relations.

Merz later said he supported Iranian regime change at the hands of the U.S. and Israel.

Following a meeting with the German chancellor at the White House last week, Trump told reporters in the Oval Office that Germany has “been great” and levied criticism toward other European allies, including the U.K. and Spain.

At same time wouldn’t mind gulf states losing money

Literally why saying were only sending defensive arms is pointless. Giving them protection from their own violent instigations only let’s them do more damage rather than keep the country safe.

It’s not but the one they’re replying too is trying to make it one to downplay how terrible Isreal is behaving

Idk, covid showed us they won’t ever decrease the prices. Economic theory be damned in the age of short term profits over everything