

Sure, but effective altruism is a specific ideology. Not just donating to causes.


Sure, but effective altruism is a specific ideology. Not just donating to causes.


The problem with “effective altruism” ideology, it’s dependent on the whims of the wealthy.
Source: I just feel like it’s true right now.


I mean, you don’t have a right to shoot up an airport though.
That’s kind of the important detail here.
You also need a big fat tummy


I feel like we would have a whole new set of never before considered problems to deal with.


Whoa, let’s not get ahead of ourselves.


We’re strongly considering thinking about having a meeting to decide if we should do something at some point in the future!


Amazingly cowardly speech.
“We aren’t doing anything today or tomorrow but oh boy just you wait!”


Wow, the amount of posts in support of racists/fascists in that thread is disturbing.
Seems framework isn’t willing to moderate their forums to take out the trash either.


Do you have a point?
Owning marijuana leaves causes just as much harm as owning oregano.


That’s just incorrect, the majority of these are run by local governments.


As a distributed platform nobody “owns” the fediverse.
One can swap instances and accounts without loosing access to any content.
As for freedom of speech, you have to understand the paradox of tolerance. To maintain freedom of speech you must ensure speech that would advocate for fascism and those who would speak it are suppressed.


No, I believe means of communication should not be owned by private entities. While they are, I do not care for the rights of such entities.


No, cause turning point USA doesn’t have a first amendment right.


Bullshit, a corporation has no first amendment right as it is not a person.


Why not both?


Regardless of what you call it basic rights such as freedom of speech need to be protected, both from government infringement and private interest infringement.
Damn, really hard hitting news.